<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Caveats when using least congested in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/caveats-when-using-least-congested/m-p/665841#M214041</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;any experience (good or bad) using this? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-W&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 20:14:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>walterbates2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-03T20:14:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Caveats when using least congested</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/caveats-when-using-least-congested/m-p/665841#M214041</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;any experience (good or bad) using this? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-W&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 20:14:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/caveats-when-using-least-congested/m-p/665841#M214041</guid>
      <dc:creator>walterbates2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T20:14:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Caveats when using least congested</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/caveats-when-using-least-congested/m-p/665842#M214042</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try these links:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/prod_release_note09186a00806528d4.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/prod_release_note09186a00806528d4.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/cscowork/ps3915/prod_release_note09186a00806e9b42.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/cscowork/ps3915/prod_release_note09186a00806e9b42.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/index.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:45:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/caveats-when-using-least-congested/m-p/665842#M214042</guid>
      <dc:creator>b.hsu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-21T17:45:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Caveats when using least congested</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/caveats-when-using-least-congested/m-p/665843#M214043</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would not... but that is my preference from my experience using that feature.  If you test it, you will see neighbor ap's on the same channel.  Unless they fixed that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:05:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/caveats-when-using-least-congested/m-p/665843#M214043</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-22T01:05:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

