<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic carrier busy test in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/carrier-busy-test/m-p/379112#M214517</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Need explanation if this is good or bad from a cisco AIR-AP1231G-A-K9 with 12.3(2)JA software.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Frequency  Carrier Busy %&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2412       32&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2417	   38&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2422	   25&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2427	   80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2432	   24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2437	   47&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2442	   67&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2447	   22&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2452	   38&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2457	   12&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2462	   23&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 17:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>schaufd</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T17:31:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>carrier busy test</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/carrier-busy-test/m-p/379112#M214517</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Need explanation if this is good or bad from a cisco AIR-AP1231G-A-K9 with 12.3(2)JA software.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Frequency  Carrier Busy %&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2412       32&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2417	   38&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2422	   25&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2427	   80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2432	   24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2437	   47&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2442	   67&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2447	   22&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2452	   38&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2457	   12&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2462	   23&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 17:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/carrier-busy-test/m-p/379112#M214517</guid>
      <dc:creator>schaufd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T17:31:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: carrier busy test</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/carrier-busy-test/m-p/379113#M214518</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;it doesnt look really good, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the more % you have the more "BUSY" is that channel. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;good would be 0% =;-)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;bernhard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 08:40:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/carrier-busy-test/m-p/379113#M214518</guid>
      <dc:creator>BERNHARD FIEGLMUELLER</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-04T08:40:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: carrier busy test</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/carrier-busy-test/m-p/379114#M214520</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;These numbers are a guide to help you choose an appropriate channel.  Based on these results, it looks like your best choice is probably channel 11.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These numbers look kind of high to me.  In my testing, I don't normally see numbers higher than about 20%.  You could always setup and see what happens.  If the clients are passing voice or video, my guess is that it will no work well.  If the clients are just passing plain old data, you might get acceptable performance (probably just need to test).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:55:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/carrier-busy-test/m-p/379114#M214520</guid>
      <dc:creator>kecampbe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-04T15:55:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

