<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BR350 deployment in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-deployment/m-p/163861#M215018</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes you can do this but a few comments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the non root#2 has a line of site it will associate to the root before it will associate to #1.  If it associates to #1 then #1 will be a repeater and this will half the throughput as every packet it receives that is not desinted for itsself will be re transmitted on the radio link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there is NO wired clients at site 1 and 2 then your cheaper option would be just 3 AP's and let the wireless client roam between the 3 AP's as long as you can get ethernet connect to the nework for the AP's at all 3 sites&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2003 04:57:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>derwin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-05-16T04:57:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BR350 deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-deployment/m-p/163860#M215017</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;is this deployment possible [ root(yagi)---- non-root w/c #1(omni)----non-root w/c#2 (omni)].&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) all br350s are in a row&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) all br350s are same channel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) the distance between root and non-root is over 500m.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4) wireless lan client is only one user, and which user is moving around wireless lan zone. and there is no wired user.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is this deployment available? and is there any interruption between non-root#1 and non-root #2 ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 15:42:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-deployment/m-p/163860#M215017</guid>
      <dc:creator>yong1794</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T15:42:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BR350 deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-deployment/m-p/163861#M215018</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes you can do this but a few comments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the non root#2 has a line of site it will associate to the root before it will associate to #1.  If it associates to #1 then #1 will be a repeater and this will half the throughput as every packet it receives that is not desinted for itsself will be re transmitted on the radio link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there is NO wired clients at site 1 and 2 then your cheaper option would be just 3 AP's and let the wireless client roam between the 3 AP's as long as you can get ethernet connect to the nework for the AP's at all 3 sites&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2003 04:57:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-deployment/m-p/163861#M215018</guid>
      <dc:creator>derwin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-16T04:57:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

