<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Support for dACL at WLC in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-dacl-at-wlc/m-p/3938046#M215653</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any plan to support dACLs in the WLC?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as I know, SGACLs are supported, right? What's the difference between both if, in the end the SAGCLs implement filters based on destination ports, the IP addressing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 18:06:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Antonio Macia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-05T18:06:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Support for dACL at WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-dacl-at-wlc/m-p/3938046#M215653</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any plan to support dACLs in the WLC?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as I know, SGACLs are supported, right? What's the difference between both if, in the end the SAGCLs implement filters based on destination ports, the IP addressing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 18:06:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-dacl-at-wlc/m-p/3938046#M215653</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antonio Macia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T18:06:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support for dACL at WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-dacl-at-wlc/m-p/3938263#M215654</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;On the traditional WLCs (85xx,55xx,35xx,25xx), you have to locally define those ACL in order to call as part of AAA override. This is mainly due to AireOS running on WLC as oppose to IOS/IOS-XE on switches.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Newer WLCs, (9800 series) is based on IOS-XE, so you should have same capability as any other 9000 series catalyst&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rasika&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Pls rate all useful responses ***&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2019 20:07:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-dacl-at-wlc/m-p/3938263#M215654</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rasika Nayanajith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-09T20:07:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support for dACL at WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-dacl-at-wlc/m-p/3938599#M215655</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Rasika.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will check the capabilities of the new 9800 series.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:27:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-dacl-at-wlc/m-p/3938599#M215655</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antonio Macia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-10T08:27:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

