<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Backup and failover recommandations in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/backup-and-failover-recommandations/m-p/2136711#M218218</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two 5508 WLC's setup to run about 200 AP's as the moment.&amp;nbsp; This is a hospital with patient care now running over wireless.&amp;nbsp; I am looking for the best scenario to minimize down time.&amp;nbsp; Currently both controllers are in the same mobility group and I will be setting the primary / secondary controller in the High Availability tab for each AP.&amp;nbsp; Most setting are all default still.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would it better to setup the primary/secondary from the global configuration?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I leave them in the same mobility group if I use the global configuration?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My only problem so far is having AP's on different controllers caused some response delay as clients move from one controller to the other.&amp;nbsp; I need to find the best possible response time with the lowest possible fail-over time.&amp;nbsp; Any recommondeations or links to a good article on this subject?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Todd&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 06:12:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>todd.johnsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T06:12:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Backup and failover recommandations</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/backup-and-failover-recommandations/m-p/2136711#M218218</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two 5508 WLC's setup to run about 200 AP's as the moment.&amp;nbsp; This is a hospital with patient care now running over wireless.&amp;nbsp; I am looking for the best scenario to minimize down time.&amp;nbsp; Currently both controllers are in the same mobility group and I will be setting the primary / secondary controller in the High Availability tab for each AP.&amp;nbsp; Most setting are all default still.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would it better to setup the primary/secondary from the global configuration?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I leave them in the same mobility group if I use the global configuration?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My only problem so far is having AP's on different controllers caused some response delay as clients move from one controller to the other.&amp;nbsp; I need to find the best possible response time with the lowest possible fail-over time.&amp;nbsp; Any recommondeations or links to a good article on this subject?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Todd&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 06:12:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/backup-and-failover-recommandations/m-p/2136711#M218218</guid>
      <dc:creator>todd.johnsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T06:12:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Backup and failover recommandations</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/backup-and-failover-recommandations/m-p/2136712#M218219</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What you would want to do is set the Primay/Secondary on a Per AP basis, the global configuration are technically 4th and 5th in the WLC failover process.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could do this via the CLI, or NCS/WCS if you have it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes keeping them in the same mobility group would be preferred.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for the roaming, are the WLC using the same layer 2 vlan/subnets, or are they using different ones?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH, &lt;BR /&gt;Steve &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ &lt;BR /&gt;Please remember to rate useful posts, and mark questions as answered&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:35:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/backup-and-failover-recommandations/m-p/2136712#M218219</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-10T17:35:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Backup and failover recommandations</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/backup-and-failover-recommandations/m-p/2136713#M218220</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both WLC's are in the same subnet.&amp;nbsp; I had one AP out of six in a patient area switch over to the secondary and there was a strange delay when clients moved in and out of that AP area.&amp;nbsp; I figured it was relating to a different management IP or something.&amp;nbsp; Of course that was before I read up that both WLC should have the same Virtual IP...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:28:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/backup-and-failover-recommandations/m-p/2136713#M218220</guid>
      <dc:creator>todd.johnsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-10T18:28:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Backup and failover recommandations</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/backup-and-failover-recommandations/m-p/2136714#M218221</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have read some instructions for changing the timeout’s and polling.&amp;nbsp; Does anyone recommend this or are the defaults acceptable? I want minimal downtime but I also need stability. Anyone have horror stories they want to share or some best practice advice?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:27:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/backup-and-failover-recommandations/m-p/2136714#M218221</guid>
      <dc:creator>todd.johnsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-10T20:27:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Backup and failover recommandations</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/backup-and-failover-recommandations/m-p/2136715#M218222</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you need AP SSO then use the new HA from 7.3 code. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10315/products_tech_note09186a0080bd3504.shtml"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10315/products_tech_note09186a0080bd3504.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:18:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/backup-and-failover-recommandations/m-p/2136715#M218222</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saravanan Lakshmanan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-11T23:18:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

