<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cisco in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco/m-p/2024846#M218312</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;that will work just fine.&amp;nbsp; The WLC will only try to send traffic out of ports that are up.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only thing you can't do is split the LAG to different non-stacked switches&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH, &lt;BR /&gt;Steve &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ &lt;BR /&gt;Please remember to rate useful posts, and mark questions as answered&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-26T19:04:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco/m-p/2024845#M218311</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a Cisco 5508 controller and am considering using LAG. Can I&amp;nbsp; enable LAG but only use 2-4 of the 8 available ports on the 5508? Does&amp;nbsp; anyone see any issues with doing this? I am asking because currently I&amp;nbsp; don't have enough ports on my 3750G switch to accomidate all 8 ports on&amp;nbsp; the 5508.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 05:43:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco/m-p/2024845#M218311</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dan Johnson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T05:43:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco/m-p/2024846#M218312</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;that will work just fine.&amp;nbsp; The WLC will only try to send traffic out of ports that are up.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only thing you can't do is split the LAG to different non-stacked switches&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH, &lt;BR /&gt;Steve &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ &lt;BR /&gt;Please remember to rate useful posts, and mark questions as answered&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco/m-p/2024846#M218312</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-26T19:04:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco/m-p/2024847#M218313</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve is on target ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Think of LAG like a PORT CHANNEL .. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;__________________________________________________________________________________________ &lt;BR /&gt;"Satisfaction does not come from knowing the solution, it comes from knowing why." - Rosalind Franklin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco/m-p/2024847#M218313</guid>
      <dc:creator>George Stefanick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-26T19:07:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

