topic Re: Static NAT required but the Outside NAT pool already exhuast in Wireless https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/static-nat-required-but-the-outside-nat-pool-already-exhuasted/m-p/1941338#M218504 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>this question should be moved to the Security &gt; firewall forum. This sub board is for wireless security. </P><P></P><P>Steve</P><P></P><P>Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App</P></BODY></HTML> Mon, 12 Mar 2012 03:48:15 GMT Stephen Rodriguez 2012-03-12T03:48:15Z Static NAT required but the Outside NAT pool already exhuasted https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/static-nat-required-but-the-outside-nat-pool-already-exhuasted/m-p/1941337#M218503 <P>Hello Guys,</P><P></P><P>I got a project where I have to provide NATTED addresses to cutomers for the internal servers and I found out that the outside address range /27 already in use. We are using 5510 with ver 8.1. We cant use PAT here.</P><P>Any other option to acomplish this task, please help</P> Sun, 04 Jul 2021 04:46:21 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/static-nat-required-but-the-outside-nat-pool-already-exhuasted/m-p/1941337#M218503 muztech76 2021-07-04T04:46:21Z Re: Static NAT required but the Outside NAT pool already exhuast https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/static-nat-required-but-the-outside-nat-pool-already-exhuasted/m-p/1941338#M218504 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>this question should be moved to the Security &gt; firewall forum. This sub board is for wireless security. </P><P></P><P>Steve</P><P></P><P>Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App</P></BODY></HTML> Mon, 12 Mar 2012 03:48:15 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/static-nat-required-but-the-outside-nat-pool-already-exhuasted/m-p/1941338#M218504 Stephen Rodriguez 2012-03-12T03:48:15Z