<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic WPA/AES and WPA2/AES in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wpa-aes-and-wpa2-aes/m-p/1153025#M21888</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there any difference between WPA/AES and WPA2/AES.  I realize that WPA was pre-standard but I'm wondering if there are any "technical" differences.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help is greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 00:28:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rsumpter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T00:28:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WPA/AES and WPA2/AES</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wpa-aes-and-wpa2-aes/m-p/1153025#M21888</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there any difference between WPA/AES and WPA2/AES.  I realize that WPA was pre-standard but I'm wondering if there are any "technical" differences.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help is greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 00:28:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wpa-aes-and-wpa2-aes/m-p/1153025#M21888</guid>
      <dc:creator>rsumpter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T00:28:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WPA/AES and WPA2/AES</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wpa-aes-and-wpa2-aes/m-p/1153026#M21889</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Security is the same. There are differences under the hood with regard to roaming and caching, header labels, and a few other things. WPA/AES is not tested during the WiFi Alliance certification process so there's potential for compatibility issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your clients can't support WPA2 then they probably can't support WPA/AES either, so my thinking is go with the certified combinations and do WPA2/AES and WPA/TKIP. (There's no reason in the world to enable WPA2/TKIP since all WPA2 clients must support AES.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:07:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wpa-aes-and-wpa2-aes/m-p/1153026#M21889</guid>
      <dc:creator>gamccall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-21T18:07:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WPA/AES and WPA2/AES</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wpa-aes-and-wpa2-aes/m-p/1153027#M21890</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx for the feedback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:41:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wpa-aes-and-wpa2-aes/m-p/1153027#M21890</guid>
      <dc:creator>rsumpter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-21T21:41:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

