<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 5508 Redundancy in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5508-redundancy/m-p/1380357#M219464</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what about management and ap-manager on same VLAN on 5508?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you receive any error message or warning when you configured ap-manager on same VLAN as management interface on 5508?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regarding failover, there is a note in conf guide 6.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"For 5500 series controllers in a non-link-aggregation (non-LAG) configuration, the management interface must be on a different VLAN than any dynamic AP-manager interface. Otherwise, the management interface cannot fail over to the port that the AP-manager is on."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;　&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;　&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;　&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:48:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dinko Mihelcic</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-26T13:48:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>5508 Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5508-redundancy/m-p/1380355#M219462</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to get redundancy operating correctly. What I have done so far is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Created a management interface 10.136.0.13 with dynamic ap management disabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A "ap-manager-primary" 10.136.0.15 interface on port 1 with dynamic ap management enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A "ap-manager-backup" 10.136.0.14 interface on port 2 with dynamic ap management enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See the attached screenshot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Port 1 is connected to one core switch and port 2 is connected to the other core switch. Initially this seemed to work fine. If core switch 1 goes down the 10.136.0.13 management interface was still reachable over port 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However when port 1 comes back up it doesnt seem to preempt and stays active on port 2. And so what I found is that when port 2 goes down the WLC isnt accessable on the 10.136.0.13 management interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How do people normally conifgure the 5508 across two core switches?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 01:33:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5508-redundancy/m-p/1380355#M219462</guid>
      <dc:creator>eoinwhite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T01:33:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 5508 Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5508-redundancy/m-p/1380356#M219463</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Two&amp;nbsp; questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Is management port configured with port 2 as backup?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. How you are testing the port going down?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(cable removed, shut down on switch side, disable on WLC side, etc)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Active/backup scenario should recover after 30 seconds of primary port coming back up. If this is not happening, please let me know to follow up on this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:21:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5508-redundancy/m-p/1380356#M219463</guid>
      <dc:creator>Javier Contreras</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-26T09:21:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 5508 Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5508-redundancy/m-p/1380357#M219464</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what about management and ap-manager on same VLAN on 5508?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you receive any error message or warning when you configured ap-manager on same VLAN as management interface on 5508?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regarding failover, there is a note in conf guide 6.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"For 5500 series controllers in a non-link-aggregation (non-LAG) configuration, the management interface must be on a different VLAN than any dynamic AP-manager interface. Otherwise, the management interface cannot fail over to the port that the AP-manager is on."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;　&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;　&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;　&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:48:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5508-redundancy/m-p/1380357#M219464</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dinko Mihelcic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-26T13:48:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 5508 Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5508-redundancy/m-p/1380358#M219465</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dinko your spot on ... management and AP manager on the same VLAN. Can't understand why I can't have this but I guess this is why it isnt failing back.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eoin.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:04:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5508-redundancy/m-p/1380358#M219465</guid>
      <dc:creator>eoinwhite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-01T15:04:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

