<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Stable Mesh code version in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/stable-mesh-code-version/m-p/1170159#M219850</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are no internal APs.  This is for mesh only.  I don't mind running 4.1 if it is more stable than 5.2.  I have been using 4.2 still for my internal networks because of all the issues I heard about with 5.x code. I would rather be stable than have more features.  If you think 5.2 is more stable for mesh than 4.1 then I will use 5.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:39:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jsmbrown</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-01-12T16:39:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Stable Mesh code version</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/stable-mesh-code-version/m-p/1170157#M219848</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am getting ready to install a mesh network with 1242s and am wondering which version of controller code do you recommend?  I am looking for the most stability.  &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 23:58:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/stable-mesh-code-version/m-p/1170157#M219848</guid>
      <dc:creator>jsmbrown</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T23:58:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stable Mesh code version</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/stable-mesh-code-version/m-p/1170158#M219849</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your best bet, would be to go with the 5.2 train.  This will support all the internal AP, as well as the 1520 MESH AP.  if you need to use 1510, then you would need to go with 4.1.192.35M.  As always, I recommend you read the release notes for each version to help you decide which version to go with.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:36:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/stable-mesh-code-version/m-p/1170158#M219849</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-12T16:36:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stable Mesh code version</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/stable-mesh-code-version/m-p/1170159#M219850</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are no internal APs.  This is for mesh only.  I don't mind running 4.1 if it is more stable than 5.2.  I have been using 4.2 still for my internal networks because of all the issues I heard about with 5.x code. I would rather be stable than have more features.  If you think 5.2 is more stable for mesh than 4.1 then I will use 5.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:39:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/stable-mesh-code-version/m-p/1170159#M219850</guid>
      <dc:creator>jsmbrown</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-12T16:39:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

