<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 4402 Network Routes in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/4402-network-routes/m-p/980061#M220041</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may need to implement  router(s) between the two in order to make the route tables meet your needs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:48:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ericgarnel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-19T12:48:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>4402 Network Routes</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/4402-network-routes/m-p/980058#M220038</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am having a tough time with setting up the "Network Routes" on our 4402. I am trying to add our ohter subnets but I get the "gateway needs to be on the service port" message?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My Service Port interface is on a dot 3 so why when I add a dot 8 to the "Network Routes" would I put a dot 3 as the Gateway IP Address? the gatewy should be dot 8.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also noticed that the Service Port is optional, perhaps I will not configure this for now?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 23:02:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/4402-network-routes/m-p/980058#M220038</guid>
      <dc:creator>whitefalcon6</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T23:02:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4402 Network Routes</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/4402-network-routes/m-p/980059#M220039</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps it is because that the management and dynamic ports are actually on a switchport that it itself does not "understand" routing. You are basically trying to tell the controller to use the same physical interface for trunking and routing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:55:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/4402-network-routes/m-p/980059#M220039</guid>
      <dc:creator>ericgarnel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-17T18:55:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4402 Network Routes</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/4402-network-routes/m-p/980060#M220040</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What i'm saying is if I add a dot 8 to the network routes the gateway HAS to be dot 8, not a dot 3 just because that is the subnet that the service-port is on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How do I get around this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:11:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/4402-network-routes/m-p/980060#M220040</guid>
      <dc:creator>whitefalcon6</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-17T19:11:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4402 Network Routes</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/4402-network-routes/m-p/980061#M220041</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may need to implement  router(s) between the two in order to make the route tables meet your needs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:48:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/4402-network-routes/m-p/980061#M220041</guid>
      <dc:creator>ericgarnel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-19T12:48:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

