<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MFP Experiences? in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mfp-experiences/m-p/618880#M220920</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We had some significant issues with MFP with Intel clients. We did not track down the root cause, but disabling it seemed to remove many issues. I decided I would hold off re-enabling it for the time being.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I remember correctly, the Intel was receiving a de-auth frame that it considered invalid because of MFP. This frame caused some versions of the Intel driver to wedge, and we had to disable/enable the nic to re-gain wireless access.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is also limited benefits to MFP until more clients actually support it fully, so I think it will be more practical in a year or two. However, I would be curious as well to hear other feedback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please remember to rate all helpful posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:00:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ethiel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-01-17T21:00:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MFP Experiences?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mfp-experiences/m-p/618879#M220919</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm wondering how people's experiences have been with MFP, after enabling it on the wireless controllers.  How well does/did it work, has it caused any problems?  (And what controller version were you running at the time?)  I have Intel 2200BG and 3945ABG clients (running WPA + TKIP), and I'm wondering if MFP could cause more problems than it's worth.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 20:28:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mfp-experiences/m-p/618879#M220919</guid>
      <dc:creator>estein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T20:28:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MFP Experiences?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mfp-experiences/m-p/618880#M220920</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We had some significant issues with MFP with Intel clients. We did not track down the root cause, but disabling it seemed to remove many issues. I decided I would hold off re-enabling it for the time being.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I remember correctly, the Intel was receiving a de-auth frame that it considered invalid because of MFP. This frame caused some versions of the Intel driver to wedge, and we had to disable/enable the nic to re-gain wireless access.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is also limited benefits to MFP until more clients actually support it fully, so I think it will be more practical in a year or two. However, I would be curious as well to hear other feedback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please remember to rate all helpful posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:00:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mfp-experiences/m-p/618880#M220920</guid>
      <dc:creator>ethiel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-17T21:00:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MFP Experiences?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mfp-experiences/m-p/618881#M220921</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am interested to know if there are any updates to this post from anyone on this forum.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone used this on a guest WLAN with anchor mobility?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has the Intel issue been resolved?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mark&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:24:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mfp-experiences/m-p/618881#M220921</guid>
      <dc:creator>mark.cronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-08T13:24:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MFP Experiences?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mfp-experiences/m-p/618882#M220922</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yeah we found a deauth issue with Intel 3945/4965 when running MFP (very noticable with session timeout configured, which triggers a deauth). We raised this with Intel and they saw the same and managed to fix it. Last I saw, it will be integrated in their WW10 2009 release.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:07:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mfp-experiences/m-p/618882#M220922</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matthew Fowler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-12T00:07:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

