<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic OEAP 600 security concern in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/oeap-600-security-concern/m-p/2156216#M22423</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I use a few 600OEAP and I love them. But there is thing I don't like and maybe I just didn't find the right way to fix that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In some szenarios I have the OEAP connected to an public IP, on exibitions sometimes e.g. or with really cool DSL providers like I have &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/49467"&gt;@home&lt;/a&gt;..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I saw that I'm able to connect the AP also on the WAN IP, thats sometimes really cool, but only by http, is there a way to change that to SSL, SSH or to add an ACL to prevent it only from Management IPs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If not, please Cisco add this to the OEAP600 it would be a big improvement like I think.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ideas &amp;amp;comment are welcome. I use the code 7.0.240.0 in the moment, I can only update as soons as the Prime is installed. that is in planning in the moment..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sebastian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 06:31:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sebastian Helmer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T06:31:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OEAP 600 security concern</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/oeap-600-security-concern/m-p/2156216#M22423</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I use a few 600OEAP and I love them. But there is thing I don't like and maybe I just didn't find the right way to fix that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In some szenarios I have the OEAP connected to an public IP, on exibitions sometimes e.g. or with really cool DSL providers like I have &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/49467"&gt;@home&lt;/a&gt;..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I saw that I'm able to connect the AP also on the WAN IP, thats sometimes really cool, but only by http, is there a way to change that to SSL, SSH or to add an ACL to prevent it only from Management IPs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If not, please Cisco add this to the OEAP600 it would be a big improvement like I think.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ideas &amp;amp;comment are welcome. I use the code 7.0.240.0 in the moment, I can only update as soons as the Prime is installed. that is in planning in the moment..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sebastian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 06:31:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/oeap-600-security-concern/m-p/2156216#M22423</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sebastian Helmer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T06:31:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OEAP 600 security concern</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/oeap-600-security-concern/m-p/2156217#M22424</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hear ya, but here is what is stated in the OEAP 600 guide&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It is expected that the home teleworker installs the Cisco Aironet 600 Series OEAP behind a home router as this product is not designed to replace the functionality of a home router. This is because the current version of this product does not have firewall support, PPPoE support or port forwarding. These are features customers expect to find in a home router.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;While this product can work without a home router, it is recommended not to position it that way for the reasons stated. Also, there can be compatibility issues connecting directly to some modems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 23:08:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/oeap-600-security-concern/m-p/2156217#M22424</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-13T23:08:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

