<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Mobility Group in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282954#M225764</link>
    <description>Cisco controllers can only form a mobility with another Cisco controller. Any other vendor equipment will not work.  This goes for the opposite also, no vendors support another vendor equipment for wireless ap join or tunneling. &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2021 09:29:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-31T09:29:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mobility Group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282098#M225688</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I enable encryption on a new Mobility group im about to create will it reboot the WLC,? we already have a mobility group which does not use encryption.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;wlc 8540&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;code 8.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 20:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282098#M225688</guid>
      <dc:creator>benolyndav</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T20:07:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282114#M225689</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Enabling/Disabling new mobility in aireOS will reboot the WLAN controller, enabling/disabling Data Encryption with mobility peer doesn't reboot the&amp;nbsp;WLAN controller.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 12:46:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282114#M225689</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jegan Rajappa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-29T12:46:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282376#M225698</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you asking about "Enable New Mobility(Converged Access)" or adding or modifying a new/existing group?&amp;nbsp; Adding or modifying will not need a reboot.&amp;nbsp; Also, the controller will prompt you to reboot if a reboot is needed, it will not reboot on its own.&amp;nbsp; This is for any configuration change.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:06:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282376#M225698</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-29T18:06:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282390#M225699</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Enabling new mobility (Converged access) would reboot the controller on its own Scott, I have 500+ aireOS controllers in my environment which is using new mobility, I cannot use EOIP tunnel in those because EOIP protocol is not supported by Meraki security Gateway, so I am using new mobility to form mobility tunnel between foreign and anchor WLAN controllers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:24:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282390#M225699</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jegan Rajappa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-29T18:24:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282418#M225708</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;New mobility is when you have converged access and need to create a mobility between AireOS and Converged access.&amp;nbsp; If its between AireOS controllers, you should not use new mobility.&amp;nbsp; I don't know many folks who still use Converged Access.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 19:07:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282418#M225708</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-29T19:07:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282530#M225713</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You are correct Scott, In my case I have foreign and anchor WLAN controller in each branch office, Meraki security appliance in middle, as Meraki doesn't support EOIP tunnel, the only way to form mobility tunnel is with new mobility.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the summary from Meraki TAC case&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;#########################&lt;BR /&gt;Name of Customer:&lt;BR /&gt;- XXX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the problem:&lt;BR /&gt;- Unable to pass EoIP traffic&lt;BR /&gt;○ Test clients (both WLAN clients)&lt;BR /&gt;§ Source: X.X.X.X&lt;BR /&gt;§ Destination: X.X.X.X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What actions were taken?&lt;BR /&gt;- ICMP and Mping works but epings do not&lt;BR /&gt;- This is expected behavior.&lt;BR /&gt;○ Currently the MX can only rewrite TCP, UDP and ICMP traffic when in NAT mode. The IP protocol 97 would have to be encapsulated in TCP or UDP to be routed.&lt;BR /&gt;§ To summarize, EoIP is not supported on the MX&lt;BR /&gt;○ This is a hardware limitation and would be a feature request.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are the next steps and why?&lt;BR /&gt;- Case closed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;##################&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 22:29:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282530#M225713</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jegan Rajappa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-29T22:29:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282717#M225730</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We presently have a Mobility group with our Foreign and Anchor WLC, Im looking at broadcasting a 3rd parties SSID and wondering if the best way would be to create another Mobility group bewteen our Foreign and the 3rd party Foreign WLC and map their SSID to the tunnel somehow. Is this the best way to do this ???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 15:50:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282717#M225730</guid>
      <dc:creator>benolyndav</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-30T15:50:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282954#M225764</link>
      <description>Cisco controllers can only form a mobility with another Cisco controller. Any other vendor equipment will not work.  This goes for the opposite also, no vendors support another vendor equipment for wireless ap join or tunneling. &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2021 09:29:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282954#M225764</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-31T09:29:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282973#M225767</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I say 3rd party I mean contractors who work at our site, we are going to broadcast their SSID so I am planning on creating a secure tunnel between our Cisco WLC and their Cisco WLC, is the best way to do this by creating a new tunnel withe their WLC and can I map their SSID to the new tunnel which sends the traffic down the tunnel to their radius server etc, also can this be added to our current mobility group or would it be better to create a new one for the sharing with Contractor company.??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:55:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4282973#M225767</guid>
      <dc:creator>benolyndav</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-31T10:55:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4283054#M225780</link>
      <description>Okay... well it’s up to you and if you can both manage the ssid to be in sync. You can always create a new mobility member using a different mobility group name. &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:08:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group/m-p/4283054#M225780</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-31T16:08:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

