<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic How to keep high availability or N+1 for Embedded Wireless Controller in fabric mode in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/how-to-keep-high-availability-or-n-1-for-embedded-wireless/m-p/4401202#M229248</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I configured two switch Catalyst 9300 as a Embedded Wireless Controller (9800) in the DNA Center server version 2.1.2.4 in fabric mode.&lt;BR /&gt;MY question, how to keep high availability in two Embedded Wireless controllers is&amp;nbsp;we using the concept&amp;nbsp; N+1 HA.&lt;BR /&gt;I found in cisco’s official documentation&lt;BR /&gt;• The N+1 HA configuration is supported only in a nonfabric deployment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created a fabric, two border Node 9500, Edges Nodes 9300 integrations with ISE with Success everything goes just fine&lt;BR /&gt;how to ensure high availability between two switchs Catalyst 9300 works as Embedded Wirelles Control (9800) as I said that N+1 HA works safe non fabric deployment&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there an official cisco guide that talked about high availability or N+1 for embedded wireless on fabric mode ??&lt;BR /&gt;Is Feasible high availability or N+1 for EWC on mode fabric mode from version DNA Center 2.1.2.4 or later ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regard,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 20:17:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>khalilsoltani47714</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-05T20:17:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to keep high availability or N+1 for Embedded Wireless Controller in fabric mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/how-to-keep-high-availability-or-n-1-for-embedded-wireless/m-p/4401202#M229248</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I configured two switch Catalyst 9300 as a Embedded Wireless Controller (9800) in the DNA Center server version 2.1.2.4 in fabric mode.&lt;BR /&gt;MY question, how to keep high availability in two Embedded Wireless controllers is&amp;nbsp;we using the concept&amp;nbsp; N+1 HA.&lt;BR /&gt;I found in cisco’s official documentation&lt;BR /&gt;• The N+1 HA configuration is supported only in a nonfabric deployment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created a fabric, two border Node 9500, Edges Nodes 9300 integrations with ISE with Success everything goes just fine&lt;BR /&gt;how to ensure high availability between two switchs Catalyst 9300 works as Embedded Wirelles Control (9800) as I said that N+1 HA works safe non fabric deployment&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there an official cisco guide that talked about high availability or N+1 for embedded wireless on fabric mode ??&lt;BR /&gt;Is Feasible high availability or N+1 for EWC on mode fabric mode from version DNA Center 2.1.2.4 or later ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regard,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 20:17:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/how-to-keep-high-availability-or-n-1-for-embedded-wireless/m-p/4401202#M229248</guid>
      <dc:creator>khalilsoltani47714</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T20:17:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to keep high availability or N+1 for Embedded Wireless Controller in fabric mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/how-to-keep-high-availability-or-n-1-for-embedded-wireless/m-p/4401208#M229249</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Look at the below document and Limitations : (N+1 redundancy design)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/catalyst-9800-series-wireless-controllers/guide-c07-744299.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/catalyst-9800-series-wireless-controllers/guide-c07-744299.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 14:55:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/how-to-keep-high-availability-or-n-1-for-embedded-wireless/m-p/4401208#M229249</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-11T14:55:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to keep high availability or N+1 for Embedded Wireless Controller in fabric mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/how-to-keep-high-availability-or-n-1-for-embedded-wireless/m-p/4401240#M229254</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your feedback&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/286878"&gt;@balaji.bandi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;now i'm a little confused about EWC Catalyst 9300&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Embedded Wireless Controller in fabric mode is support HA or N+1&amp;nbsp; ???&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 15:40:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/how-to-keep-high-availability-or-n-1-for-embedded-wireless/m-p/4401240#M229254</guid>
      <dc:creator>khalilsoltani47714</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-11T15:40:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to keep high availability or N+1 for Embedded Wireless Controller in fabric mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/how-to-keep-high-availability-or-n-1-for-embedded-wireless/m-p/4401274#M229257</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not tested with Cat 9300 switches. biut as per the doc :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV class=" pQuestionCMT" style="page-break-before: always;"&gt;Will Embedded Wireless on Cat9k using WebUI support high availability?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class=" pAnswerCMT"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 14.0pt; color: #00bceb;"&gt;A.&lt;SPAN style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;Yes, Embedded Wireless on Cat9k using WebUI will support N+1 capability (Primary and secondary controller) on Catalyst 9300, 9400 and 9500 switches. Access point and client SSO between two stacked Cisco Catalyst 9300 Series Switches is supported. Catalyst 9400 can support SSO through dual-sup on a single chassis. Catalyst 9500 HA SSO is not supported. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 16:21:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/how-to-keep-high-availability-or-n-1-for-embedded-wireless/m-p/4401274#M229257</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-11T16:21:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

