<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 9130 vs 9120 LAPs in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4481050#M234102</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;9130s not&amp;nbsp;Wi-Fi 6?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Taken from ordering guide:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C9130AXI-x&lt;BR /&gt;Cisco Catalyst 9130AXI Access Point, internal antennas; 802.11ax; 8x8:8 MIMO&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C9120AXI-x&lt;BR /&gt;Cisco Catalyst 9120AXI Access Point, internal antennas; &lt;STRONG&gt;Wi-Fi 6;&lt;/STRONG&gt; 4x4:4 MIMO&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 13:29:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lcaruso</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-10-06T13:29:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>9130 vs 9120 LAPs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4480495#M234076</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a project to replace all legacy APs with new ones and 9800 based controllers in a hospital with medical branches connected. Are there any compelling reasons to go with the 9130s over the 9120s for this application? They seem very similar.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2021 18:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4480495#M234076</guid>
      <dc:creator>lcaruso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-05T18:34:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9130 vs 9120 LAPs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4480574#M234080</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would say go with 9120 as both have s&lt;SPAN&gt;imilar coverage size and probably&amp;nbsp;you will need to quote similar number of AP's and also in a hospital I do not think there will be areas in hospital where you need&amp;nbsp;2Qty 5GHz radios and 1Qty 2.4GHz radio in a single AP. If dual 5GHz is required&amp;nbsp;you can selectively convert XOR radios to 5GHz after making sure that the 2.4GHz coverage is sufficient. Best way to find out&amp;nbsp;is doing an onsite survey.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Make sure that you are not mixing these 2 AP models in a single roaming domain, my experience where I have 9120 and 9130 mixed, some clients are sticky in certain 9130 AP's (apple) and some are sticky to 9120, we ended up having lot of roaming issues.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:41:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4480574#M234080</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arshad Safrulla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-05T20:41:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9130 vs 9120 LAPs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4480678#M234082</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;9130 has BLE.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A number of businesses now require BLE.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;NOTE:&amp;nbsp; Talk to your Cisco AM/SE/PSS and ask them about Catalyst 9136.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:57:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4480678#M234082</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-06T00:57:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9130 vs 9120 LAPs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4481050#M234102</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;9130s not&amp;nbsp;Wi-Fi 6?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Taken from ordering guide:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C9130AXI-x&lt;BR /&gt;Cisco Catalyst 9130AXI Access Point, internal antennas; 802.11ax; 8x8:8 MIMO&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C9120AXI-x&lt;BR /&gt;Cisco Catalyst 9120AXI Access Point, internal antennas; &lt;STRONG&gt;Wi-Fi 6;&lt;/STRONG&gt; 4x4:4 MIMO&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 13:29:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4481050#M234102</guid>
      <dc:creator>lcaruso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-06T13:29:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9130 vs 9120 LAPs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4481464#M234128</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/324624"&gt;@lcaruso&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;9130s not&amp;nbsp;Wi-Fi 6?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The first Cisco WiFi6-capable AP is 9136.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;9120/9130 are only "ax", hence the product ID has "AX".&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For "consistency", 9136 will be called "C9136I-x" where "X" is the Regulatory Domain.&amp;nbsp; There will also be a few new "Regulatory Domain", such as ROW (Rest Of the World).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;NOTE&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp; The info I have just provided is &lt;STRONG&gt;NOT&lt;/STRONG&gt; "NDA".&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 22:56:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4481464#M234128</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-06T22:56:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9130 vs 9120 LAPs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4481741#M234150</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just to clarify&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/326026"&gt;@Leo Laohoo&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Both 9120 and 9130 has BLE radios&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. 802.11ax is Wi-Fi6 and both 9120 and 9130 are Wi-Fi6 certified (aka 802.11ax)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. There is no confirmation on Cisco on the speculated Cat9136 &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;(Supposedly Wi-Fi6E capable not certified yet)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt; nor Cisco released any timeline publicly yet, so do not depend on it for now. Wi-Fi6E standard is not yet embraced by some regulatory domains, and we are still seeing Wave 1 AP's and N AP's in production,&amp;nbsp; so transition will be very slow. I would say invest in your wired infra to embrace Wi-Fi6E once it becomes available in GA,&amp;nbsp; wired infra must cover mGig switches and Cat6A cables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wi-Fi6E allowed countries&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.wi-fi.org/countries-enabling-wi-fi-6e" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.wi-fi.org/countries-enabling-wi-fi-6e&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:54:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4481741#M234150</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arshad Safrulla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-07T09:54:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9130 vs 9120 LAPs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4612397#M242105</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There's one thing that I didn't see mentioned.&amp;nbsp; The 9120 AP does not support&amp;nbsp;WPA3 with GCMP 256 encryption.&amp;nbsp; If this is a requirement for your SSID, you'll need a 9130.&amp;nbsp; Trying these settings on a 9120 causes the AP to no longer host the SSID.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 13:55:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9130-vs-9120-laps/m-p/4612397#M242105</guid>
      <dc:creator>vtaylor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-18T13:55:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

