<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Wireless bridging in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4481593#M234144</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- I was thinking it might be , it would be nice if Cisco could remove FAQ's &lt;EM&gt;which are totally outdated.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 06:14:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-10-07T06:14:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wireless bridging</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4480712#M234086</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Which access points can be used as wireless bridges these days?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 02:23:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4480712#M234086</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcelnjkoks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-06T02:23:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless bridging</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4480779#M234090</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- FYI :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless-mobility/wireless-lan-wlan/16041-bridge-faq.html#q1a" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless-mobility/wireless-lan-wlan/16041-bridge-faq.html#q1a&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;However the particular FAQ is from 2009 ...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 06:45:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4480779#M234090</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-06T06:45:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless bridging</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4481292#M234112</link>
      <description>Yes, this is not a valid document anymore.&lt;BR /&gt;Hence my remark about these days. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 18:12:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4481292#M234112</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcelnjkoks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-06T18:12:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless bridging</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4481350#M234121</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you are looking for a point to point bridge my recommendation would be to go with Fluidmesh, If you are looking for point to point bridge using Cisco Wireless AP's then you can use Catalyst 9124, Aironet 1562, Aironet 3802 are some examples, this list may vary on the platform of WLC, code running etc. So take a good look at the release notes before you quote or purchase.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 19:44:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4481350#M234121</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arshad Safrulla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-06T19:44:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless bridging</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4481361#M234123</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;if you like Autonomous AP using as bridges (Root/Non-Root/WGB), ac wave1 APs (x700 series) are the best. Yes, Cisco has discontinued autonomous code products, still, it works if you are happy with 11ac wave 1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;WGB functionality is there in x800 series products, also mesh option there with WLC based APs&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rasika&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Pls rate all useful responses ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 19:52:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4481361#M234123</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rasika Nayanajith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-06T19:52:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless bridging</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4481593#M234144</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- I was thinking it might be , it would be nice if Cisco could remove FAQ's &lt;EM&gt;which are totally outdated.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 06:14:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4481593#M234144</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-07T06:14:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless bridging</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4482107#M234168</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Wouldn't that be nice!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 18:21:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4482107#M234168</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcelnjkoks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-07T18:21:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless bridging</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4482108#M234169</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, we're putting a solution together with 1562's.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 18:23:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-bridging/m-p/4482108#M234169</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcelnjkoks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-07T18:23:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

