<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Switch for fabric enabled APs in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/switch-for-fabric-enabled-aps/m-p/4492125#M234868</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I need to buy a new switch to support APs in a new area.&amp;nbsp; This particular switch will just support APs.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Initially, they will be local mode CAPWAP APs, but in the future they will be part of an SDA fabric.&amp;nbsp; Any limitations if I use a Cat9200 vs Cat9300 switch to run these?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 19:40:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Wes Schochet</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-10-25T19:40:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Switch for fabric enabled APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/switch-for-fabric-enabled-aps/m-p/4492125#M234868</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I need to buy a new switch to support APs in a new area.&amp;nbsp; This particular switch will just support APs.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Initially, they will be local mode CAPWAP APs, but in the future they will be part of an SDA fabric.&amp;nbsp; Any limitations if I use a Cat9200 vs Cat9300 switch to run these?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 19:40:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/switch-for-fabric-enabled-aps/m-p/4492125#M234868</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wes Schochet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-25T19:40:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Switch for fabric enabled APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/switch-for-fabric-enabled-aps/m-p/4492139#M234869</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i would prefer to use Cat 9300 (looks for correct License)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 20:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/switch-for-fabric-enabled-aps/m-p/4492139#M234869</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-25T20:30:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Switch for fabric enabled APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/switch-for-fabric-enabled-aps/m-p/4492174#M234873</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;9200 doesnt support Fabric in a box, and none of the 9200 switches support UPOE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;9300 supports both of the above.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For Fabric enabled wireless requirement is that AP must be directly connected to a fabric edge extended node switch. I would agree with&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/286878"&gt;@balaji.bandi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;to go with 9300 or 9300L platform switches if the budget permits.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 21:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/switch-for-fabric-enabled-aps/m-p/4492174#M234873</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arshad Safrulla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-25T21:43:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

