<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: WCS reporting issue in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-reporting-issue/m-p/1197447#M24322</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The confusing thing is that the report specifically has different classifications in the selection criteria , ' friendly ' is in the drop down - but it won't report on friendly AP's ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:39:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rwilletts</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-03-27T09:39:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WCS reporting issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-reporting-issue/m-p/1197445#M24320</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When reporting on Rogues in WCS ( all versions ) using Reports &amp;gt; Rogue AP's , the report never lists any other types of AP other than ' malicious ' , even though ' friendly ' AP's exist &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any one else had this issue ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 00:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-reporting-issue/m-p/1197445#M24320</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwilletts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T00:22:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WCS reporting issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-reporting-issue/m-p/1197446#M24321</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's normal.  Even with the WLC, you'll never see the "friendly" until you go to the option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:58:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-reporting-issue/m-p/1197446#M24321</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-26T22:58:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WCS reporting issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-reporting-issue/m-p/1197447#M24322</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The confusing thing is that the report specifically has different classifications in the selection criteria , ' friendly ' is in the drop down - but it won't report on friendly AP's ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:39:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-reporting-issue/m-p/1197447#M24322</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwilletts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-27T09:39:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WCS reporting issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-reporting-issue/m-p/1197448#M24323</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The logic is why would you want to see your AP's classified as "friendly".   As a (wireless) administrator, you are more concerend about AP's that are not friendly to you, i.e.  Unclassified and Rogue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:41:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-reporting-issue/m-p/1197448#M24323</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-27T23:41:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

