<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 9800-40 IOSd CPU resource tuning in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4640370#M243743</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;17.8.1 is latest code - so TAC may help you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;what happends when you disable SNMP ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 16:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-28T16:43:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>9800-40 IOSd high CPU utilization 1000 APs and AP SNMP requests</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4640366#M243742</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;linux_iosd-image is getting its CPU resource allotment maxed out on a 9800-40 (e.g. from output of "show proc cpu history"&amp;nbsp; due to a large amount of SNMP. Concerned that this will cause problems with wireless RADIUS, is there any way to tune the CPU resources available to linux_iosd-image? The overall CPU utilization of the box is around 10% (show proc cpu platform sorted) but seems IOSd only gets a tiny slice of that on the 9800-40. Running 17.8.1 because of mDNS wired MAC filtering support.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 16:10:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4640366#M243742</guid>
      <dc:creator>jasonm002</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-30T16:10:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9800-40 IOSd CPU resource tuning</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4640370#M243743</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;17.8.1 is latest code - so TAC may help you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;what happends when you disable SNMP ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 16:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4640370#M243743</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-28T16:43:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9800-40 IOSd CPU resource tuning</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4640375#M243745</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I can work around the issue by applying control-plane policer or filtering out SNMP from the host sending all the packets (it's an in-house monitoring system), just wondering if there was a way to tune resources available to IOSd because it doesn't seem to be granted much more than 10% of the total CPU resources. It's probably been like that in every version I would guess. People may not have noticed yet because I would guess most are not running over 1000 APs on a 9800-40.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 16:52:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4640375#M243745</guid>
      <dc:creator>jasonm002</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-28T16:52:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9800-40 IOSd CPU resource tuning</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4640384#M243748</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Try your option see is that improves, not that i aware older code have that same issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;but suggest to take TAC side view also good ( as mentioned this is new version of of code) - not many using, since you like to use because of the features you need it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 16:58:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4640384#M243748</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-28T16:58:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9800-40 IOSd CPU resource tuning</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4640563#M243766</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When the CPU goes up again, post the complete output to the following commands:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;sh platform resources&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;sh platform software status con brief&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:27:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4640563#M243766</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-29T00:27:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9800-40 IOSd CPU resource tuning</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4641719#M243843</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just worked around the issue for now by attaching an SNMP view that excludes&amp;nbsp;ciscoMgmt.513 and&amp;nbsp;enterprises.14179.2 which should be everything in the airespace and lwapp-ap MIBs.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue should be reproducible on a controller with ~1000 APs if you have something requesting these SNMP OID names every minute or more frequently:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;bsnAPIfOperStatus&lt;BR /&gt;bsnApIfNoOfUsers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cLLwappUpTime&lt;BR /&gt;cLApUpTime&lt;BR /&gt;cLApCpuCurrentUsage&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;these might also contribute but not sure&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;entSensorStatus&lt;BR /&gt;entPhySensorOperStatus&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;all of those had hundreds of request hits in the output of "show snmp stats oid" while the issue was occurring.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i'm afraid I don't have the time for a TAC case at the moment but - issue has been worked around for now with the SNMP view.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 16:05:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4641719#M243843</guid>
      <dc:creator>jasonm002</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-30T16:05:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9800-40 IOSd high CPU utilization 1000 APs and AP SNMP requests</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4654272#M244341</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks - good to know.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. That's very frequent to be polling those MIBs!&lt;BR /&gt;2. A lot of the Airespace MIBs have only been added in recent versions as they weren't supported at all in the earlier releases so a lot of this stuff is actually very new and not being used by many people.&amp;nbsp; Cisco would like everyone to use streaming telemetry instead on 9800.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check out&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/catalyst-9800-series-wireless-controllers/217460-monitor-catalyst-9800-wlc-via-snmp-with.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/catalyst-9800-series-wireless-controllers/217460-monitor-catalyst-9800-wlc-via-snmp-with.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've already reported a bug with the &lt;SPAN&gt;cpmCPUMemoryUsed &amp;amp; cpmCPUMemoryFree&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;MIBs on HA-SSO pair - they stop working after switchover to chassis 2.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:11:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9800-40-iosd-high-cpu-utilization-1000-aps-and-ap-snmp-requests/m-p/4654272#M244341</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-21T00:11:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

