<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Access points compatibility in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-points-compatibility/m-p/4648156#M244062</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As the link is provided below, I would preferably avoid putting them in case area, you can have 2 physically separate locations one with aironet another with catalyst, both managed by same controller.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:25:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ambuj M</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-07-11T00:25:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Access points compatibility</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-points-compatibility/m-p/4646536#M244041</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have small doubt, can we join/co-exist both Aironet AP's and CatalystAP's on 9800WLC simultaneously?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 10:01:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-points-compatibility/m-p/4646536#M244041</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mateen Ahmad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-08T10:01:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Access points compatibility</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-points-compatibility/m-p/4646550#M244043</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- You can but they need to be compatible ,&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/compatibility/matrix/compatibility-matrix.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/compatibility/matrix/compatibility-matrix.html&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;, also as far as I understand it you can't go beyond 17.3.x with Aironet AP's.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/catalyst-9800-series-wireless-controllers/214749-tac-recommended-ios-xe-builds-for-wirele.html#anc13" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/catalyst-9800-series-wireless-controllers/214749-tac-recommended-ios-xe-builds-for-wirele.html#anc13&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- Also note that the latest generation of cisco wifi6e-capable access points require at least 17.6.x , so mixing such an environment will not be possible.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 17:29:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-points-compatibility/m-p/4646550#M244043</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-08T17:29:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Access points compatibility</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-points-compatibility/m-p/4648156#M244062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As the link is provided below, I would preferably avoid putting them in case area, you can have 2 physically separate locations one with aironet another with catalyst, both managed by same controller.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:25:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-points-compatibility/m-p/4648156#M244062</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ambuj M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-11T00:25:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

