<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EWC Deployment in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4692059#M246314</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Good to know &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/286878"&gt;@balaji.bandi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- not tried it myself.&lt;BR /&gt;Obviously code versions must match and if features aren't supported they just won't work or if they do (by luck) then you can't rely that they'll keep working.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:43:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-22T11:43:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4678717#M245544</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know the best practice for EWC deployment. Currently having EWC 10x C9120AXI-K. Not very sure for the design whether should go for 10x C9120AXI-K all as EWC or make it 2x C9120AXI-K EWC(HA) and convert 8 C9120AXI-K to lightweight AP. Any advise?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:34:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4678717#M245544</guid>
      <dc:creator>ShahrulEzwvn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-30T13:34:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4678728#M245545</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you looking HA, you can deploy 2 AP as HA environment and rest will join controller is good option i casee.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/embedded-wireless-controller-catalyst-access-points/white-paper-c11-743398.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/embedded-wireless-controller-catalyst-access-points/white-paper-c11-743398.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:54:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4678728#M245545</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-30T13:54:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4678732#M245546</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there any issue if all 10 APs running as EWC?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4678732#M245546</guid>
      <dc:creator>ShahrulEzwvn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-30T13:57:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4678781#M245552</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;why do you want to do that ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:16:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4678781#M245552</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-30T15:16:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4678928#M245564</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The 10 APs came with EWC or is it better to run 2 APs as EWC and the rest convert it as lightweight AP?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 21:35:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4678928#M245564</guid>
      <dc:creator>ShahrulEzwvn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-30T21:35:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4679093#M245566</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;gt;...&amp;nbsp;or is it better to run 2 APs as EWC and the rest convert it as lightweight AP&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Yes, if you want to use 2 EWC, use&lt;STRONG&gt; HA-mode &lt;/STRONG&gt;and or check this document :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/ewc/17-7/config-guide/ewc_cg_17_7/m_ewc_high_availability.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/ewc/17-7/config-guide/ewc_cg_17_7/m_ewc_high_availability.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; , if not use one EWC only&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:24:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4679093#M245566</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-31T08:24:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4679294#M245577</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't know what the official best practice recommended option is but agree with&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/286878"&gt;@balaji.bandi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Having them all running EWC probably just increases the complexity of the solution so keep it simple and make sure your 2 EWC APs are in the best/most secure locations least likely to encounter problems then no concern about APs in more risky locations potentially becoming controllers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:56:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4679294#M245577</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-31T15:56:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4691700#M246291</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi thanks, can two ewc use different model?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:31:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4691700#M246291</guid>
      <dc:creator>ShahrulEzwvn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-22T00:31:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4691701#M246292</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i would suggest having the same model for redundancy.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:39:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4691701#M246292</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-22T00:39:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4691704#M246293</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I see ok thanks. Lets say all APs are set, EWC HA and the capwap aps. If one of the EWC down, still require to check the firmware/code to run?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:56:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4691704#M246293</guid>
      <dc:creator>ShahrulEzwvn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-22T00:56:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4692008#M246309</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;if all working as expected, if the EWC primary failes, AP will move to Secondary,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Make sure EWC both AP run same code and same models. ( i would refer the document which was posted my first post for reference how you can build HA using EWC)/&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:09:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4692008#M246309</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-22T10:09:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4692049#M246311</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Same model is not mandatory but I'd suggest is best practice.&lt;BR /&gt;Refer to election process in&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/embedded-wireless-controller-catalyst-access-points/white-paper-c11-743398.html#EWCHAactiveandstandby" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/embedded-wireless-controller-catalyst-access-points/white-paper-c11-743398.html#EWCHAactiveandstandby&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:49:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4692049#M246311</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-22T10:49:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4692052#M246312</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/244975"&gt;@Rich R&lt;/a&gt; - as per my testing if not same model N+1&amp;nbsp; deployment, we see odd issues around it took from failover take 3min.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you also clarify, how about if we use different codes and not supported features ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4692052#M246312</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-22T11:07:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4692059#M246314</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good to know &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/286878"&gt;@balaji.bandi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- not tried it myself.&lt;BR /&gt;Obviously code versions must match and if features aren't supported they just won't work or if they do (by luck) then you can't rely that they'll keep working.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:43:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4692059#M246314</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-22T11:43:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EWC Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4692822#M246378</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks all. Will test the failover and post the result when get the chance. Cheers.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 14:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ewc-deployment/m-p/4692822#M246378</guid>
      <dc:creator>ShahrulEzwvn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-23T14:08:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

