<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: LAG WLC Sw in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lag-wlc-sw/m-p/4696753#M246620</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So it would be one channel for each controller?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:12:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leonardo Santana</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-30T13:12:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LAG WLC Sw</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lag-wlc-sw/m-p/4696733#M246617</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have two 3504 controllers in HA and i have a doubt about the LAG config at switch side, the controllers will be using the same channel group right?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;AIR-CT3504-K9&lt;BR /&gt;8.10.130.0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SWITCH CONFIG&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface Port-channelX&lt;BR /&gt;description WLC-3504&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk allowed vlan X,X,X&lt;BR /&gt;switchport mode trunk&lt;BR /&gt;switchport nonegotiate&lt;BR /&gt;logging event trunk-status&lt;BR /&gt;logging event bundle-status&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernetX&lt;BR /&gt;description WLC-3504&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk allowed vlan X,X,X&lt;BR /&gt;switchport mode trunk&lt;BR /&gt;switchport nonegotiate&lt;BR /&gt;logging event trunk-status&lt;BR /&gt;logging event bundle-status&lt;BR /&gt;load-interval 30&lt;BR /&gt;duplex full&lt;BR /&gt;channel-group X mode on&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree portfast trunk&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree bpduguard enable&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernetX&lt;BR /&gt;description WLC-3504&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk allowed vlan X,X,X&lt;BR /&gt;switchport mode trunk&lt;BR /&gt;switchport nonegotiate&lt;BR /&gt;logging event trunk-status&lt;BR /&gt;logging event bundle-status&lt;BR /&gt;load-interval 30&lt;BR /&gt;duplex full&lt;BR /&gt;channel-group X mode on&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree portfast trunk&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree bpduguard enable&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernetX&lt;BR /&gt;description WLC-3504&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk allowed vlan X,X,X&lt;BR /&gt;switchport mode trunk&lt;BR /&gt;switchport nonegotiate&lt;BR /&gt;logging event trunk-status&lt;BR /&gt;logging event bundle-status&lt;BR /&gt;load-interval 30&lt;BR /&gt;duplex full&lt;BR /&gt;channel-group X mode on&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree portfast trunk&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree bpduguard enable&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 12:37:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lag-wlc-sw/m-p/4696733#M246617</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leonardo Santana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-30T12:37:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LAG WLC Sw</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lag-wlc-sw/m-p/4696736#M246618</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- No they don't , you need a separate network connection&amp;nbsp; for each (in essence)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 12:43:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lag-wlc-sw/m-p/4696736#M246618</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-30T12:43:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LAG WLC Sw</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lag-wlc-sw/m-p/4696753#M246620</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So it would be one channel for each controller?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:12:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lag-wlc-sw/m-p/4696753#M246620</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leonardo Santana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-30T13:12:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LAG WLC Sw</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lag-wlc-sw/m-p/4696772#M246623</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- It would be better to check the documentation first and then configure everything accordingly :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/8-7/High_Availability_DG.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/8-7/High_Availability_DG.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lag-wlc-sw/m-p/4696772#M246623</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-30T13:52:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LAG WLC Sw</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lag-wlc-sw/m-p/4697397#M246684</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So it would be one channel for each controller? YES&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2022 07:17:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lag-wlc-sw/m-p/4697397#M246684</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-03T07:17:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

