<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 9100 EWC deployment in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9100-ewc-deployment/m-p/4709151#M247459</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We need your support to deploy 9100 EWC in network. We have 9120 AXI WLC. Can EWC be deployed with LAG ? If yes, what would be steps from both end. Also suggest , if we are deploying EWC with redundancy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 05:55:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ahmad.syed</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-25T05:55:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>9100 EWC deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9100-ewc-deployment/m-p/4709151#M247459</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We need your support to deploy 9100 EWC in network. We have 9120 AXI WLC. Can EWC be deployed with LAG ? If yes, what would be steps from both end. Also suggest , if we are deploying EWC with redundancy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 05:55:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9100-ewc-deployment/m-p/4709151#M247459</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahmad.syed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-25T05:55:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9100 EWC deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9100-ewc-deployment/m-p/4709453#M247489</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not that I am aware or I have tested LAG, but I am sure it supports &lt;STRIKE&gt;trunk or&lt;/STRIKE&gt; access port.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/244975"&gt;@Rich R&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- apologies for that statement. you are right. after reading the notes I agree.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2022 18:39:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9100-ewc-deployment/m-p/4709453#M247489</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-26T18:39:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9100 EWC deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9100-ewc-deployment/m-p/4709610#M247499</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The LAG support feature is applicable for access points that support multiple ethernet ports. However, the AP 9120AX only has one ethernet port, which makes it not LAG capable.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 16:36:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9100-ewc-deployment/m-p/4709610#M247499</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonathga94</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-25T16:36:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9100 EWC deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9100-ewc-deployment/m-p/4710654#M247531</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As far as I know it does not support LAG.&amp;nbsp; Also&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/286878"&gt;@balaji.bandi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;this says it cannot be trunked:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/embedded-wireless-controller-on-catalyst-access-points/215303-embedded-wireless-controller-conversion.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/embedded-wireless-controller-on-catalyst-access-points/215303-embedded-wireless-controller-conversion.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H2 id="toc-hId--645894144"&gt;EWC on Catalyst AP Limitations&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;EWC is not capable of having its Gig 0 interface configured as trunk&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;EWC does not support SVIs&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;EWC is not capable of performing central switching&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Gig 0 is the only interface that can be used as a Wireless Management&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;All of the EWC traffic has to be sourced from Gig 0 interface (including radius, capwap control, licensing traffic, and so on..)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;EWC is not capable of performing embedded packet captures&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;EWC does not support APs in sniffer mode&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;EWC image does not boot up if there is another EWC, AireOS or 9800 WLC in the same broadcast domain. The AP will continue to function as a normal lightweight capwap AP until the other WLCs are removed from the network.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;When converting or upgrading EWC in a deployment with mixed AP models, it is required to have a functioning TFTP server&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9100-ewc-deployment/m-p/4710654#M247531</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-26T11:55:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

