<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: WCS HEAT MAPS in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-heat-maps/m-p/717359#M24795</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, I believe that the WCS planning tool uses the worst case scenario setup for your access points. Granted, you are not in the planning mode, but the policies still apply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>justinfvoeller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-06-07T15:49:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WCS HEAT MAPS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-heat-maps/m-p/717357#M24793</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have WCS Base + Location and are setting up our heat maps. We have a mostly re-enforce concrete wall facility. If we add the thick walls to areas that has walls the heat maps report coverage holes. The traps are not reporting holes. and preliminary surveys do not show holes. Question, are the Map tools just for prediction or should we using different walls?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 21:08:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-heat-maps/m-p/717357#M24793</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike Lydick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T21:08:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WCS HEAT MAPS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-heat-maps/m-p/717358#M24794</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Michael,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would stick with the walls the way they are. As you have correctly noted the Heat Maps are just a tool to be used in conjunction with other available tools. The more important one being the "site survey". &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just my two cents &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 12:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-heat-maps/m-p/717358#M24794</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Huffman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-31T12:27:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WCS HEAT MAPS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-heat-maps/m-p/717359#M24795</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, I believe that the WCS planning tool uses the worst case scenario setup for your access points. Granted, you are not in the planning mode, but the policies still apply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-heat-maps/m-p/717359#M24795</guid>
      <dc:creator>justinfvoeller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-07T15:49:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

