<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Radius and Tacacs at c9800 in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radius-and-tacacs-at-c9800/m-p/4757087#M250549</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Most cases&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;TACACS for device management ( to manage device administration using ISE Local database / AD)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Radius for WIFI client authentication. (this can be AD / or any other source)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 22:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-18T22:56:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Radius and Tacacs at c9800</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radius-and-tacacs-at-c9800/m-p/4757080#M250546</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I have a question on below document/link, which is talking about setup RADIUS and TACACS+ at wlc 9800. Both Radius and Tacacs has very similar configuration at c9800. The question is why it use both Radius and Tacacs at C9800 at the same time, or it just talk about two ways for us to choose one of the two? Is there a big difference of the two for c9800? Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/catalyst-9800-series-wireless-controllers/214490-configure-radius-and-tacacs-for-gui-and.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/catalyst-9800-series-wireless-controllers/214490-configure-radius-and-tacacs-for-gui-and.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 22:45:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radius-and-tacacs-at-c9800/m-p/4757080#M250546</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leftz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-18T22:45:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Radius and Tacacs at c9800</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radius-and-tacacs-at-c9800/m-p/4757087#M250549</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Most cases&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;TACACS for device management ( to manage device administration using ISE Local database / AD)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Radius for WIFI client authentication. (this can be AD / or any other source)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 22:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radius-and-tacacs-at-c9800/m-p/4757087#M250549</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-18T22:56:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Radius and Tacacs at c9800</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radius-and-tacacs-at-c9800/m-p/4757092#M250550</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;tacacs vs radius&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;radius merge the auth and authz in same packet&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;tacacs use separate,&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;so I think that tacacs is more better use than radius for any CoA or command restrict.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:20:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radius-and-tacacs-at-c9800/m-p/4757092#M250550</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-19T00:20:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Radius and Tacacs at c9800</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radius-and-tacacs-at-c9800/m-p/4757897#M250589</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank all you for your reply!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/286878"&gt;@balaji.bandi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Can I say we can use both Radius and TACACS+ for one c9800 or just choose one of both?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:19:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radius-and-tacacs-at-c9800/m-p/4757897#M250589</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leftz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-19T17:19:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Radius and Tacacs at c9800</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radius-and-tacacs-at-c9800/m-p/4758053#M250599</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Mixing is not good, my suggestion always use TACACS for device authentication.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:50:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radius-and-tacacs-at-c9800/m-p/4758053#M250599</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-19T18:50:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

