<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cisco AP in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap/m-p/4775909#M251738</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 09:18:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Orkhan Hajizada</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-15T09:18:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco AP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap/m-p/4775207#M251693</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello! Does&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;Tx Power Level affect on AP range? What's best practise for it?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And in what order levels are? The 1 level is the strongest power tx powet?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:08:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap/m-p/4775207#M251693</guid>
      <dc:creator>Orkhan Hajizada</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-14T12:08:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco AP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap/m-p/4775494#M251721</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; Does&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;Tx Power Level affect on AP range?&lt;BR /&gt;Yes&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; What's best practise for it?&lt;BR /&gt;Conduct a full site survey with appropriate power levels set according to the design specifications. Generally speaking you should not be using power level 1.&amp;nbsp; Also remember it's no good having high power from an AP that can reach far if the return signal from the client cannot reach back to the AP.&amp;nbsp; High AP power can also cause or aggravate the&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidden_node_problem" target="_blank"&gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidden_node_problem&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; And in what order levels are? The 1 level is the strongest power tx powet?&lt;BR /&gt;Power level 1 is the highest.&amp;nbsp; The actual power will vary according to AP, antenna, channel and regulatory domain.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 19:10:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap/m-p/4775494#M251721</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-14T19:10:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco AP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap/m-p/4775527#M251726</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The Cisco Power levels translate to dBm or mW values, Cisco used them as some channels can utilise higher dBm values and also differences between reglatory domains.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Whilst increasing the power level will increase how far the AP can be heard it does not increase how well it can hear - think of it of I have a loud speaker to talk accross a crowd but you don’t, you will hear me but I wont hear you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Generally the practice is to look to keep the AP power levels within 3dBm of the clients capability, a general practice is to utilise 25mW as the design.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I normally then configure RRM to use 11-17 dBm for the power levels which allows the APs a few levels to increase and decrease, but I then follow it up with a site survey using tools like Ekahau.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap/m-p/4775527#M251726</guid>
      <dc:creator>Haydn Andrews</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-14T20:49:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco AP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap/m-p/4775733#M251733</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/332987"&gt;@Haydn Andrews&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/244975"&gt;@Rich R&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; Thank you for your answers! One more question. Does the 1 power(the strongest)&amp;nbsp; affect on something on AP? Maybe lifetime of AP?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 05:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap/m-p/4775733#M251733</guid>
      <dc:creator>Orkhan Hajizada</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-15T05:33:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco AP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap/m-p/4775895#M251737</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does the 1 power(the strongest)&amp;nbsp; affect on something on AP? Maybe lifetime of AP?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;No, it should not.&amp;nbsp; I'm certainly not aware of any evidence that it does.&amp;nbsp; Quality of components used seems to be the main determinant of AP lifetime.&amp;nbsp; WiFi transmit power is pretty low in absolute terms, even when at max level (as per Haydn's answer), so there's no reason why the power level should affect AP lifetime.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 09:02:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap/m-p/4775895#M251737</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-15T09:02:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco AP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap/m-p/4775909#M251738</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 09:18:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap/m-p/4775909#M251738</guid>
      <dc:creator>Orkhan Hajizada</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-15T09:18:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

