<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AP signal strength in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9120-ewlc-to-capwap-conversion-permanently/m-p/4779946#M251997</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Vendor will not put this information in a Data sheet for obivious reason. How far the signal goes does not rely on the Access Point but on the environment itself.&amp;nbsp; Not only obscule reduce signal coverage but noise also can. So, what vendors inform is the power and the gain.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;But I did many tests in the past and in a open space at maximum power an AP reach 100m with at lest -85dBm RSSI.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 22:00:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Flavio Miranda</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-21T22:00:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>9120 eWLC to capwap conversion permanently</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9120-ewlc-to-capwap-conversion-permanently/m-p/4779892#M251989</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I want to convert a previous EWC AP back to lightweight.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've done ap-type capwap, but show version still tells me the AP is EWC capable. Does anyone know how I can make the AP lightweight mode only?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;AP Running Image : 17.3.4.154&lt;BR /&gt;Primary Boot Image : 17.3.4.154&lt;BR /&gt;Backup Boot Image : 17.3.4.154&lt;BR /&gt;AP Image type : EWC-AP IMAGE&lt;BR /&gt;AP Configuration : EWC-AP CAPABLE&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 12:23:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9120-ewlc-to-capwap-conversion-permanently/m-p/4779892#M251989</guid>
      <dc:creator>junaid.akram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-02T12:23:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP signal strength</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9120-ewlc-to-capwap-conversion-permanently/m-p/4779946#M251997</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Vendor will not put this information in a Data sheet for obivious reason. How far the signal goes does not rely on the Access Point but on the environment itself.&amp;nbsp; Not only obscule reduce signal coverage but noise also can. So, what vendors inform is the power and the gain.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;But I did many tests in the past and in a open space at maximum power an AP reach 100m with at lest -85dBm RSSI.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 22:00:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9120-ewlc-to-capwap-conversion-permanently/m-p/4779946#M251997</guid>
      <dc:creator>Flavio Miranda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-21T22:00:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP signal strength</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9120-ewlc-to-capwap-conversion-permanently/m-p/4779976#M251998</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Get a wireless site survey done.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A lot of lucrative businesses have sprouted over the last 20 years and their job is to fix poorly designed AP placement.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 23:36:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9120-ewlc-to-capwap-conversion-permanently/m-p/4779976#M251998</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-21T23:36:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

