<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 9500 in stackWise and EWC in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9500-in-stackwise-and-ewc/m-p/4827950#M255354</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/178747"&gt;@Flavio Miranda&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Only to reconfirm, Is not necessary to break my 9500&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;StackWise, but my EWLC&amp;nbsp;will be deployed like a&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Single switch design as mentioned in the document, right?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 19:00:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Guillermo_PY</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-03T19:00:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>9500 in stackWise and EWC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9500-in-stackwise-and-ewc/m-p/4827915#M255351</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Team,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Reading the document&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/catalyst-9800-series-wireless-controllers/guide-c07-744299.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/catalyst-9800-series-wireless-controllers/guide-c07-744299.html&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;to implement EWC on 9000 series, I see this note:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Note:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;HA SSO is not supported with the Catalyst 9400 Series StackWise Virtual setups, nor with the Catalyst 9500 or 9500H Series&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And my question: Is necessary to break the stack on my 9500 to deploy EWC?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 18:18:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9500-in-stackwise-and-ewc/m-p/4827915#M255351</guid>
      <dc:creator>Guillermo_PY</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-03T18:18:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9500 in stackWise and EWC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9500-in-stackwise-and-ewc/m-p/4827940#M255353</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;No. This means that&amp;nbsp; If you have 9500 with stackwise you are not going to have HA SSO with EWLC.&amp;nbsp; That´s it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can have EWLC without HA SSO.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 18:52:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9500-in-stackwise-and-ewc/m-p/4827940#M255353</guid>
      <dc:creator>Flavio Miranda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-03T18:52:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9500 in stackWise and EWC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9500-in-stackwise-and-ewc/m-p/4827950#M255354</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/178747"&gt;@Flavio Miranda&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Only to reconfirm, Is not necessary to break my 9500&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;StackWise, but my EWLC&amp;nbsp;will be deployed like a&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Single switch design as mentioned in the document, right?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 19:00:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9500-in-stackwise-and-ewc/m-p/4827950#M255354</guid>
      <dc:creator>Guillermo_PY</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-03T19:00:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9500 in stackWise and EWC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9500-in-stackwise-and-ewc/m-p/4827955#M255355</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;that´s correct.&amp;nbsp; You can build a HA +1 topology instead.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 19:03:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9500-in-stackwise-and-ewc/m-p/4827955#M255355</guid>
      <dc:creator>Flavio Miranda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-03T19:03:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9500 in stackWise and EWC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9500-in-stackwise-and-ewc/m-p/4828991#M255449</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/762820"&gt;@Guillermo_PY&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;are you planning to use SDA EWC and non-SDA EWC?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If non-SDA then take careful note of the warning at the top of that doc:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;"&lt;STRONG&gt;Embedded Wireless on Catalyst 9000 Series Switch (non-SDA) using WebUI&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;will be&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;End of Support (Q3FY21)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;with no additional feature development or code changes and 17.3.x is the last supported release."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;non-SDA is already &lt;STRONG&gt;end of support&lt;/STRONG&gt; and you won't be able to upgrade beyond IOS-XE 17.3.x which is itself approaching end of life.&amp;nbsp; If using SDA then no problem - that is still supported.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2023 01:00:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9500-in-stackwise-and-ewc/m-p/4828991#M255449</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-05T01:00:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9500 in stackWise and EWC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9500-in-stackwise-and-ewc/m-p/4830192#M255549</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/244975"&gt;@Rich R&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; thanks for your good observation. I&amp;nbsp;will keep it in mind.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes, I have the intention to use it in non-sda&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2023 23:07:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/9500-in-stackwise-and-ewc/m-p/4830192#M255549</guid>
      <dc:creator>Guillermo_PY</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-07T23:07:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

