<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 5520 on single connection in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-on-single-connection/m-p/4911672#M260032</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Regardless if the WLC has only one link, ALWAYS configure LAG.&amp;nbsp; The "cost" of enabling LAG whilst only using one link is worth the hassle.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 01:09:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-08-25T01:09:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>5520 on single connection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-on-single-connection/m-p/4911599#M260021</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are doing some bandwidth testing and I wanted to set my 5520 up on a single 10 Gig connection.&amp;nbsp; The previous config was two 10G trunk ports in a port channel.&amp;nbsp; I configured the switch port as a trunk without the channel group and set "&lt;SPAN&gt;LAG Mode on next reboot" to disable.&amp;nbsp; After the reboot, I have no connectivity.&amp;nbsp; I was wondering if anyone has done this before or could point me in the right direction.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Wes&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 19:51:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-on-single-connection/m-p/4911599#M260021</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wes Schochet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-24T19:51:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 5520 on single connection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-on-single-connection/m-p/4911610#M260022</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure if on a single link it needs to be in port 1 or not. The only restriction I remember is if you wanted it to be a 1G link. When you say you have connectivity, you see no link light, or just can't contact the WLC?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, you mentions switchport, is it a switch or an NXOS core? They will default to the port shutdown and you need to no shut the port. Just a thought as I've done this myself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/5500/5520/install-guide/b-wlc-ig-5520/m-overview.html" target="_self"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/5500/5520/install-guide/b-wlc-ig-5520/m-overview.html&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 20:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-on-single-connection/m-p/4911610#M260022</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dustin Anderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-24T20:05:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 5520 on single connection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-on-single-connection/m-p/4911665#M260030</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/296038"&gt;@Wes Schochet&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;If you have a port-channel with 2 interface and you want to test if only one interface,&amp;nbsp; all you need to do is disconnect one cable. The idea of port-channel is offer redundancy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Now, if you put the interface in trunk on the switch side and you disable lag on the wlc side, means you put the interface in access on the wlc side.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;You should put the interface in access also in the switch side on the vlan you use to management.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thats why you probably lost access.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:09:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-on-single-connection/m-p/4911665#M260030</guid>
      <dc:creator>Flavio Miranda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-25T00:09:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 5520 on single connection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-on-single-connection/m-p/4911672#M260032</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Regardless if the WLC has only one link, ALWAYS configure LAG.&amp;nbsp; The "cost" of enabling LAG whilst only using one link is worth the hassle.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 01:09:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-on-single-connection/m-p/4911672#M260032</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-25T01:09:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 5520 on single connection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-on-single-connection/m-p/4912030#M260043</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks to all who responded.&amp;nbsp; I ended up with LAG enabled on the controller and a single, non-port-channel trunk port on the switch. This is working well: ~2,500 clients right now.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:47:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-on-single-connection/m-p/4912030#M260043</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wes Schochet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-25T13:47:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

