<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Collision avoidance at probe requests level in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/collision-avoidance-at-probe-requests-level/m-p/4920592#M260499</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Probing behaviour is depend on each vendor implementation and not listed out in great details in public.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Based on CSMA/CA operation, it is of course make a difference if those phones are in one place (more contention) vs if they are in isolated rooms (less contention, assuming they are not hear each other on same BSS)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;Rasika&lt;BR /&gt;*** Pls rate all useful responses ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 19:06:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rasika Nayanajith</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-09-08T19:06:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Collision avoidance at probe requests level</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/collision-avoidance-at-probe-requests-level/m-p/4917370#M260367</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Do smartphones implement collision avoidance techniques at probe requests level ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm wondering if placing three smartphones together in an isolated room would alter their behavior compared to when they are operating individually (especially in the probe requesting level). I suspect that their behavior might indeed change due to the presence of a collision avoidance mechanism. Do you happen to have any insights on this? Would the timing or content of probe requests be influenced by the presence of other phones nearby?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 14:31:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/collision-avoidance-at-probe-requests-level/m-p/4917370#M260367</guid>
      <dc:creator>mohamedchaaben</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-04T14:31:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Collision avoidance at probe requests level</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/collision-avoidance-at-probe-requests-level/m-p/4918199#M260400</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does this help answer your question?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://blog.ansi.org/ieee-802-11-collision-avoidance-wireless-networks/" target="_blank"&gt;https://blog.ansi.org/ieee-802-11-collision-avoidance-wireless-networks/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And this has more detail:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://howiwifi.com/2020/06/30/wireless-contention-mechanisms/" target="_blank"&gt;https://howiwifi.com/2020/06/30/wireless-contention-mechanisms/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 16:06:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/collision-avoidance-at-probe-requests-level/m-p/4918199#M260400</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-05T16:06:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Collision avoidance at probe requests level</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/collision-avoidance-at-probe-requests-level/m-p/4918942#M260420</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your consideration. I already checked those links. They don’t really answer my question. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 13:11:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/collision-avoidance-at-probe-requests-level/m-p/4918942#M260420</guid>
      <dc:creator>mohamedchaaben</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-06T13:11:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Collision avoidance at probe requests level</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/collision-avoidance-at-probe-requests-level/m-p/4920592#M260499</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Probing behaviour is depend on each vendor implementation and not listed out in great details in public.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Based on CSMA/CA operation, it is of course make a difference if those phones are in one place (more contention) vs if they are in isolated rooms (less contention, assuming they are not hear each other on same BSS)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;Rasika&lt;BR /&gt;*** Pls rate all useful responses ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 19:06:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/collision-avoidance-at-probe-requests-level/m-p/4920592#M260499</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rasika Nayanajith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-08T19:06:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

