<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Core side flaps vs port channel member status and failover in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/core-side-flaps-vs-port-channel-member-status-and-failover/m-p/5035461#M267778</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;the failover scenarios are different - i think your situation its going up and down in seconds may not detected as failure i guess.(again what interface is that connected to WLC ?)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As i mentioned again depends how this connected each other&amp;nbsp; - RP connected back to back ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;check some failure scenarios :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/global-event/docs/2022/pdf/BRKEWN-2846.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/global-event/docs/2022/pdf/BRKEWN-2846.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 03:33:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-07T03:33:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Core side flaps vs port channel member status and failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/core-side-flaps-vs-port-channel-member-status-and-failover/m-p/5035430#M267775</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I am looking for a better redundancy outcome, not to mention better understanding, given this scenario just experienced. A pair of SSO 9800-40s connected to a par of 9606s in SVL where a port channel member on the core side connecting to the active Primary starts flapping once per second due to a faulty transceiver with the result bringing down over one third of the APs across random vlans (clearly the load balancing hash algorithm sending traffic to the bit bucket). Should I not expect the 9800 side member interface to go down and failover to the standby, or said differently, is there a configuration to detect this link flapping such that the near end member signals a failover? Thanks in advance.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 01:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/core-side-flaps-vs-port-channel-member-status-and-failover/m-p/5035430#M267775</guid>
      <dc:creator>lcaruso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-07T01:06:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Core side flaps vs port channel member status and failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/core-side-flaps-vs-port-channel-member-status-and-failover/m-p/5035461#M267778</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;the failover scenarios are different - i think your situation its going up and down in seconds may not detected as failure i guess.(again what interface is that connected to WLC ?)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As i mentioned again depends how this connected each other&amp;nbsp; - RP connected back to back ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;check some failure scenarios :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/global-event/docs/2022/pdf/BRKEWN-2846.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/global-event/docs/2022/pdf/BRKEWN-2846.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 03:33:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/core-side-flaps-vs-port-channel-member-status-and-failover/m-p/5035461#M267778</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-07T03:33:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Core side flaps vs port channel member status and failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/core-side-flaps-vs-port-channel-member-status-and-failover/m-p/5035633#M267782</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;gt;...&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;is there a configuration to detect this link flapping such that the near end member signals a failover?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;- In general HA-SSO targets box failure and not link flapping&amp;nbsp; (the latter argument being&lt;STRONG&gt; 'enforced'&lt;/STRONG&gt; by the fact that link flapping is &lt;STRONG&gt;'outside'&lt;/STRONG&gt; of the &lt;U&gt;9800 controller&lt;/U&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;HA &lt;U&gt;architecture&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;)&amp;nbsp; ; you may look for improvements in the (HA-SSO) configuration by using the CLI command (on the primary controller) &lt;FONT color="#008000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;show tech wireless&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;and feed the output into&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://cway.cisco.com/wireless-config-analyzer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Wireless Config Analyzer&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; But the link should be repaired ASAP ,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:21:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/core-side-flaps-vs-port-channel-member-status-and-failover/m-p/5035633#M267782</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-07T09:21:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

