<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Capwap mtu 1005 in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5044828#M268881</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- In that screenshot I only see 1485 as MTU ,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:43:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-20T07:43:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Capwap mtu 1005</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5044741#M268871</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hi team,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In my environment, I've noticed an anomaly with our 500 APs. Around 450 of them are establishing CAPWAP tunnels with 1485 MTU, while the remaining 50 are using &amp;nbsp; 1005 MTU.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;AP Model: 9166 {All APs are in local mode}&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;WLC: 9800&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;is it any bug or configuration issue.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:37:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5044741#M268871</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sanju_13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-24T12:37:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Capwap mtu 1005</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5044790#M268879</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; - I can't see any MTU differences in your screenshot ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:06:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5044790#M268879</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-20T07:06:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Capwap mtu 1005</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5044820#M268880</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi marce,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Above the output of 'show capwap detailed | e 1485 ".&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"show capwap detailed" command output attached below.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:37:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5044820#M268880</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sanju_13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-24T12:37:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Capwap mtu 1005</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5044828#M268881</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- In that screenshot I only see 1485 as MTU ,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:43:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5044828#M268881</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-20T07:43:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Capwap mtu 1005</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5044842#M268883</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not sure you may be hitting with Bug : ( what Code running your WLC ?)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://bst.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwf52815" target="_blank"&gt;https://bst.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwf52815&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:54:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5044842#M268883</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-20T07:54:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Capwap mtu 1005</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5045099#M268894</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are using 17.9.4&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:29:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5045099#M268894</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sanju_13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-20T11:29:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Capwap mtu 1005</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5045853#M268956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;we are running 17.9.4a i dont see any issue, worth open a TAC case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 21:57:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5045853#M268956</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-20T21:57:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Capwap mtu 1005</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5045881#M268957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If these AP in site run IPSec over tunnel or over MPLS and there are multi label then ot can mtu reduce to this value.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This vlaue is nego between WLC and AP&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And both agree in one value.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I dont think it bug.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dont worry of the capwap is health&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:26:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-mtu-1005/m-p/5045881#M268957</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-20T22:26:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

