<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thanks all,what i finally got in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ha-controller-question/m-p/2422794#M26930</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what i finally got that , if we need SSO we just need HA Controller without license and the design will be N+N&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but if we need to deploy N+1 scenario we will need Controller with license to support the APs which will fallback to it if the primary controllers are down &amp;nbsp;, but in this case there will be no SSO&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 16:26:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ahmed Abouelnour</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-28T16:26:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HA controller question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ha-controller-question/m-p/2422792#M26928</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For WLC HA ,can the HA controller act as redundant controller for more than one Active controller?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 07:36:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ha-controller-question/m-p/2422792#M26928</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahmed Abouelnour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T07:36:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello,Yes you can but in an N</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ha-controller-question/m-p/2422793#M26929</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Short answer is - Yes you can but in an N+1 scenario as you describe the HA unit cannot perform SSO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This link will help explain the &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/technology/hi_avail/N1_High_Availability_Deployment_Guide/N1_HA_Overview.html#pgfId-1055144"&gt;possibilities&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;and limitations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Justin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 18:19:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ha-controller-question/m-p/2422793#M26929</guid>
      <dc:creator>Justin DeVaughn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-03T18:19:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks all,what i finally got</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ha-controller-question/m-p/2422794#M26930</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what i finally got that , if we need SSO we just need HA Controller without license and the design will be N+N&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but if we need to deploy N+1 scenario we will need Controller with license to support the APs which will fallback to it if the primary controllers are down &amp;nbsp;, but in this case there will be no SSO&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 16:26:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ha-controller-question/m-p/2422794#M26930</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahmed Abouelnour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-28T16:26:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

