<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 6E APs roaming with 9120 APs in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/6e-aps-roaming-with-9120-aps/m-p/5054624#M269556</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That will depend entire on the firmware of the controller.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Right now, all 9800 firmware is a minefield.&amp;nbsp; The firmware may work with one "family" of APs but complete opposite to another.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Take&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://quickview.cloudapps.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCwj45141" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer"&gt;CSCwj45141&lt;/A&gt;, as an example.&amp;nbsp; Not good for 9136/916x but 17.9.4 + SMU 8 but completely OK for 1800.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 01:48:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-02T01:48:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>6E APs roaming with 9120 APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/6e-aps-roaming-with-9120-aps/m-p/5054150#M269447</link>
      <description>&lt;P data-sourcepos="5:1-5:3"&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-sourcepos="7:1-7:130"&gt;I'm interested in how well clients would roam between Cisco&lt;STRONG&gt; Catalyst 9166&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;9120&lt;/STRONG&gt; access points (APs) deployed on the same floor.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-sourcepos="9:1-9:146"&gt;In my previous experience, Cisco &lt;STRONG&gt;2802&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;2702&lt;/STRONG&gt; APs didn't provide seamless roaming. We're planning to replace the 2702s with the newer 9166 model.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-sourcepos="11:1-11:125"&gt;On the other hand, user experience with roaming seems to be good between &lt;STRONG&gt;2702&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;9120&lt;/STRONG&gt; APs, even across floors and buildings.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-sourcepos="13:1-13:163"&gt;While I understand it's generally recommended to use the same AP model on a single floor, achieving complete separation can be challenging in our real-world scenario.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-sourcepos="15:1-15:89"&gt;Would you be able to advise on the expected roaming experience between &lt;STRONG&gt;9166&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;9120&lt;/STRONG&gt; APs?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-sourcepos="17:1-17:7"&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 09:54:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/6e-aps-roaming-with-9120-aps/m-p/5054150#M269447</guid>
      <dc:creator>Moudar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-01T09:54:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 6E APs roaming with 9120 APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/6e-aps-roaming-with-9120-aps/m-p/5054156#M269448</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &lt;FONT color="#008000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp; - FYI&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/6ghz-roaming-problems/m-p/5003145#M265575" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/6ghz-roaming-problems/m-p/5003145#M265575&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 10:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/6e-aps-roaming-with-9120-aps/m-p/5054156#M269448</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-01T10:31:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 6E APs roaming with 9120 APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/6e-aps-roaming-with-9120-aps/m-p/5054624#M269556</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That will depend entire on the firmware of the controller.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Right now, all 9800 firmware is a minefield.&amp;nbsp; The firmware may work with one "family" of APs but complete opposite to another.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Take&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://quickview.cloudapps.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCwj45141" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer"&gt;CSCwj45141&lt;/A&gt;, as an example.&amp;nbsp; Not good for 9136/916x but 17.9.4 + SMU 8 but completely OK for 1800.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 01:48:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/6e-aps-roaming-with-9120-aps/m-p/5054624#M269556</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-02T01:48:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

