<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: A question about RF Grouping in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/a-question-about-rf-grouping/m-p/5143055#M273419</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;There appears to be a Narrowband Jammer in the area. Haven't located the source.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Meanwhile I can use various DCA methods to mitigate the effects.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;When you are on a controller other than the leader...it gets complicated.&lt;BR /&gt;So I see no need for the the RF Group joining the two controllers. They are indenpendent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:57:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jtpntx</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-07-10T18:57:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>A question about RF Grouping</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/a-question-about-rf-grouping/m-p/5142990#M273415</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Our school district has a large Wi-Fi network with over 4200 Catalyst 9K access points (APs) spread across multiple campuses. These APs connect back to a central data center with two Cisco Catalyst 9800 80 WLCs and two 9800 40 anchors.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We've been battling interference issues at a few campuses, causing connectivity problems. I'm still troubleshooting these issues, Meanwhile Im working around it mainly with DCA.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In this process, I came across the "RF Grouping" feature on the WLCs. With our current setup, I don't see a clear benefit to grouping them. Therefore, I'm considering disabling RF Grouping on both controllers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There's a lot of information available on how to configure&amp;nbsp; RF Grouping, but I haven't found much about the potential consequences not using it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Anyone have any experience with this? Would disabling RF Grouping in our scenario cause any problems?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:03:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/a-question-about-rf-grouping/m-p/5142990#M273415</guid>
      <dc:creator>jtpntx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-10T17:03:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A question about RF Grouping</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/a-question-about-rf-grouping/m-p/5142998#M273416</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ypu use 2.4 ghz or 5 ghz rf profile?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:19:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/a-question-about-rf-grouping/m-p/5142998#M273416</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-10T17:19:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A question about RF Grouping</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/a-question-about-rf-grouping/m-p/5143033#M273417</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;both are default.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:30:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/a-question-about-rf-grouping/m-p/5143033#M273417</guid>
      <dc:creator>jtpntx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-10T18:30:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A question about RF Grouping</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/a-question-about-rf-grouping/m-p/5143048#M273418</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;5 mhz is less interference as I know.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:46:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/a-question-about-rf-grouping/m-p/5143048#M273418</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-10T18:46:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A question about RF Grouping</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/a-question-about-rf-grouping/m-p/5143055#M273419</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There appears to be a Narrowband Jammer in the area. Haven't located the source.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Meanwhile I can use various DCA methods to mitigate the effects.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;When you are on a controller other than the leader...it gets complicated.&lt;BR /&gt;So I see no need for the the RF Group joining the two controllers. They are indenpendent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:57:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/a-question-about-rf-grouping/m-p/5143055#M273419</guid>
      <dc:creator>jtpntx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-10T18:57:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

