<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Prime Infrastructure Virtual Appliance Sizing in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/prime-infrastructure-virtual-appliance-sizing/m-p/2145095#M2755</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have always only looked at the device count to make a decision on the ova size. To be honest though, I still go one higher just because the software can slow down when you start having a lot of devices and having the available resources always helps.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:08:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-20T21:08:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Prime Infrastructure Virtual Appliance Sizing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/prime-infrastructure-virtual-appliance-sizing/m-p/2145094#M2754</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are there any features in Prime Infrastructure that would require you to build a larger Virtual appliance? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The example would be if I add the assurance licenses and turn on advanced traffic monitoring. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am planning to build a medium virtual applianace based on the devices needed to support but if I turn on advanced traffic monitoring as part of the assurance part of PI should I build a large virtual appliance?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 06:45:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/prime-infrastructure-virtual-appliance-sizing/m-p/2145094#M2754</guid>
      <dc:creator>William Prentis Waters</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T06:45:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Prime Infrastructure Virtual Appliance Sizing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/prime-infrastructure-virtual-appliance-sizing/m-p/2145095#M2755</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have always only looked at the device count to make a decision on the ova size. To be honest though, I still go one higher just because the software can slow down when you start having a lot of devices and having the available resources always helps.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:08:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/prime-infrastructure-virtual-appliance-sizing/m-p/2145095#M2755</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-20T21:08:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

