<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Wireless RF Doubt in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-rf-doubt/m-p/5199106#M275998</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As per above, its because the centre channels, channel width means that they dont overlap with other channels. The frequencies are not just limited to WIFI as well&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Haydn Andrews</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-26T00:58:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wireless RF Doubt</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-rf-doubt/m-p/5198731#M275983</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;have a question that might not be well-formed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In wireless communication, the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequencies are well-known. In the 2.4 GHz band, there are three non-overlapping channels: 1, 6, and 11, which are spaced 5 channels apart. In the 5 GHz band, there are channels 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, and 60, allowing for 24 non-overlapping channels.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my question is: why is there a 5-channel gap in the 2.4 GHz band and a 4-channel gap in the 5 GHz band? How are these gaps defined, and why isn't there a 4-channel gap in the 2.4 GHz band and a 5-channel gap in the 5 GHz band?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 10:44:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-rf-doubt/m-p/5198731#M275983</guid>
      <dc:creator>veggetvettyu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-25T10:44:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless RF Doubt</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-rf-doubt/m-p/5198749#M275984</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1793603"&gt;@veggetvettyu&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;For 2.4Ghz, we have in mostly countries 13 channles. Considering a 22 MHZ channel, the non-overlaps ones must be 1, 6 and 11.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any other way to distribute it, would cause waste of RF channels and or interference. The idea is to aviod co-channel interference as well as &lt;SPAN&gt;adjacent&lt;/SPAN&gt; channel interference. If you use change 1 and 5, for example, there will be &lt;SPAN&gt;adjacent&lt;/SPAN&gt; channel interference.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="FlavioMiranda_0-1727263483698.png" style="width: 869px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/229894iA586D2FF100ABF94/image-dimensions/869x342?v=v2" width="869" height="342" role="button" title="FlavioMiranda_0-1727263483698.png" alt="FlavioMiranda_0-1727263483698.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For 5.0Ghz it is a bit complex but we can assume the same rules.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="FlavioMiranda_3-1727263711538.jpeg" style="width: 898px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/229895i75EA6B92C1A0EEBD/image-dimensions/898x386?v=v2" width="898" height="386" role="button" title="FlavioMiranda_3-1727263711538.jpeg" alt="FlavioMiranda_3-1727263711538.jpeg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditor_1118bfc4523184FlavioMiranda_1" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditor_1118bfc4523184FlavioMiranda_2" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:32:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-rf-doubt/m-p/5198749#M275984</guid>
      <dc:creator>Flavio Miranda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-25T11:32:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless RF Doubt</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-rf-doubt/m-p/5199106#M275998</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As per above, its because the centre channels, channel width means that they dont overlap with other channels. The frequencies are not just limited to WIFI as well&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-rf-doubt/m-p/5199106#M275998</guid>
      <dc:creator>Haydn Andrews</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-26T00:58:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

