<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: mesh vs. non-mesh controllers in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mesh-vs-non-mesh-controllers/m-p/883587#M27655</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hey Richard, thanks for your reply... appreciate it!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;btw, roaming is one thing,,, ap failover is another...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have 3 WiSM's... and i have only 20 1510 ap's... can the mesh ap's be mixed with the non-mesh ap's in one controller? i plan to reserve/dedicate one controller for the 1510 ap's but failover is the issue... can the mesh ap's failover to the other WLC's, where non-mesh ap's are registered? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your time!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:28:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>n.manlangit</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-26T13:28:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>mesh vs. non-mesh controllers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mesh-vs-non-mesh-controllers/m-p/883585#M27653</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;can mesh controllers be mixed with non-mesh controllers (indoor AP)? is it possible to have one roaming for both mesh and non-mesh controllers?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 21:59:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mesh-vs-non-mesh-controllers/m-p/883585#M27653</guid>
      <dc:creator>n.manlangit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T21:59:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: mesh vs. non-mesh controllers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mesh-vs-non-mesh-controllers/m-p/883586#M27654</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Obviously a WLC can only have one version of code on it, but if you have two (or more) WLCs, each running different versions of code, then "yes", is the answer.  Simply setup a mobility group, configure the same SSIDs on all WLCs, and away you go.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any questions, just ask.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Richard.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:47:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mesh-vs-non-mesh-controllers/m-p/883586#M27654</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Atkin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-26T11:47:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: mesh vs. non-mesh controllers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mesh-vs-non-mesh-controllers/m-p/883587#M27655</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hey Richard, thanks for your reply... appreciate it!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;btw, roaming is one thing,,, ap failover is another...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have 3 WiSM's... and i have only 20 1510 ap's... can the mesh ap's be mixed with the non-mesh ap's in one controller? i plan to reserve/dedicate one controller for the 1510 ap's but failover is the issue... can the mesh ap's failover to the other WLC's, where non-mesh ap's are registered? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your time!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:28:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mesh-vs-non-mesh-controllers/m-p/883587#M27655</guid>
      <dc:creator>n.manlangit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-26T13:28:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: mesh vs. non-mesh controllers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mesh-vs-non-mesh-controllers/m-p/883588#M27656</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bit of a fuzzy answer for this one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you're using new code, the answer is "no".  New code is specifically designed for Mesh or None-Mesh deployments, the different types cannot be mixed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HOWEVER&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Older code did support both types, so if you're considering an N+1 redundancy style deployment, and providing you don't mind the failover taking a few minutes, you could leave your "+1" WLC on an older code that does support both types of deployment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;w.r.t. WiSMs, the two controllers that are housed by a single WiSM can quite happily run different versions of code.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Richard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:33:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mesh-vs-non-mesh-controllers/m-p/883588#M27656</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Atkin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-26T13:33:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: mesh vs. non-mesh controllers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mesh-vs-non-mesh-controllers/m-p/883589#M27657</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;whoa! that was quick!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks, Richard!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the ideas... really helped a lot.... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:50:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mesh-vs-non-mesh-controllers/m-p/883589#M27657</guid>
      <dc:creator>n.manlangit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-26T13:50:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

