<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226576#M277952</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Exactly as&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/291804"&gt;@Mark Elsen&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;says - you must be using some sort of terminal or editor which is inserting date and time stamps which will definitely break the tool.&amp;nbsp; You &lt;STRONG&gt;must&lt;/STRONG&gt; use the actual raw "show tech wireless" output from the WLC.&amp;nbsp; Do not alter it in any way.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:03:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-11-19T23:03:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/4930294#M261058</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an issue where when some users are roaming from 1 side of the building to the next they drop off the network and have to forget and reauthenticate. I didn't set this controller up but I can see Fast transition is adaptive enabled. So I started reading up on FT and&amp;nbsp; it says Auth Key Mgmt should be FT + 802.1x where ours is set up as 802.1x. It also states flexconnect should be enabled and the AP's should all be in the same group.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can only see a default Flex profile in WLC configuration but can seem to find anything with AP groups.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 12:27:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/4930294#M261058</guid>
      <dc:creator>michaelowen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-27T12:27:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/4930299#M261059</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does the APs reside in the same "Site tag"&amp;nbsp; &amp;amp; "Policy Tag "&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 13:15:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/4930299#M261059</guid>
      <dc:creator>RoadRunner4k</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-27T13:15:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/4930326#M261062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi RoadRunner&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes both are on the same site and policy tag. I checked on the AP's and they are all set to AP Mode - Local. Most of the documents it states this should be on FlexConnect but when I click the down arrow FlexConnect isn't an option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 13:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/4930326#M261062</guid>
      <dc:creator>michaelowen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-27T13:29:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/4930365#M261066</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="assisted roaming.jpg" style="width: 819px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/198331iC096184AB65F5533/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="assisted roaming.jpg" alt="assisted roaming.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking further into the way this is configured they have only ticked Neighbor list. Should Prediction Optimization and Dual band neighbor list not be ticked?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 14:08:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/4930365#M261066</guid>
      <dc:creator>michaelowen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-27T14:08:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/4930372#M261067</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- Have a checkup of the 9800-L&amp;nbsp; configuration with the CLI command &lt;FONT color="#008000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;show tech wireless&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; and feed the output into :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://cway.cisco.com/wireless-config-analyzer/" target="_blank"&gt;https://cway.cisco.com/wireless-config-analyzer/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 14:20:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/4930372#M261067</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-27T14:20:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/4930399#M261069</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi marce&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is so good gave me lots to look into.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Found this going to make the changes and see how it goes. I will let you know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For best results, it is better to enable dual band support for 11k. This should only be avoided, if single band devices are present on the network. This is part of the WLAN profile&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 14:54:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/4930399#M261069</guid>
      <dc:creator>michaelowen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-27T14:54:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226461#M277943</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have tried this and when I upload the .log file it spins for a minute then it just goes back to the same screen and it gives me no output. Does the file need to be in a different format?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:33:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226461#M277943</guid>
      <dc:creator>William Foster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-19T18:33:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226470#M277944</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;did you use "&lt;STRONG&gt;show tech-support wireless&lt;/STRONG&gt;" as input ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:45:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226470#M277944</guid>
      <dc:creator>RoadRunner4k</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-19T18:45:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226471#M277945</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/328158"&gt;@William Foster&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; wrote&amp;nbsp; &amp;gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;...&lt;U&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;Does the file need to be in a different format?&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;No but usually the generated file from &lt;FONT color="#008000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;show tech &lt;U&gt;wireless&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; is saved as &lt;STRONG&gt;.txt&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;file ; you may want to try that ; remember do not use a simple &lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;show tech&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;, use&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;the full command as&lt;U&gt; pointed out in green ,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226471#M277945</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-19T18:48:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226504#M277947</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well Dab Nabit changing to a .txt I ended up with the same results. I wonder if it is throwing it back because of the&lt;BR /&gt;date and time stamp at the beginning of each line&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:51:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226504#M277947</guid>
      <dc:creator>William Foster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-19T19:51:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226514#M277948</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;-&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/328158"&gt;@William Foster&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote :&lt;EM&gt; &amp;gt;....Well Dab Nabit changing to a .txt I ended up with the same results. I wonder if it is throwing it back because &lt;U&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;of the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;date and time stamp at the beginning of each line&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- That should not happen and is not included behavior indeed, it means that you are using some terminal operator tool which does that , try changing to something else&amp;nbsp; such as &lt;STRONG&gt;PuTTY&lt;/STRONG&gt; or standard&lt;FONT color="#008000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;SSH access&lt;/STRONG&gt; (connection)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:01:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226514#M277948</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-19T20:01:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226576#M277952</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Exactly as&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/291804"&gt;@Mark Elsen&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;says - you must be using some sort of terminal or editor which is inserting date and time stamps which will definitely break the tool.&amp;nbsp; You &lt;STRONG&gt;must&lt;/STRONG&gt; use the actual raw "show tech wireless" output from the WLC.&amp;nbsp; Do not alter it in any way.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:03:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226576#M277952</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-19T23:03:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226591#M277960</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks my Secure CRT was doing it for some reason, but I have since corrected it. That is a pretty awesome tool. I have been having issues at a site whose wireless coverage is extremely good. I am noticing that users that are complaining are jumping between 3 APs that are closest to them. I am guessing it is roaming causing this issue. It's odd that roaming would cause them to drop though. I was remoted into a user and confirmed they are definitely dropping when they roam to a different AP. Below is what the tool you suggested produced for me.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Optimized Roaming: Optimized Roaming is enabled, this could cause roaming failures in multiple scenarios. It is recommended to use 802.11k/v roaming instead. Reported for Band(s): 2.4 GHz 5 GHz&lt;BR /&gt;Action: Disable the feature using the command ap dot11 5ghz/24ghz rrm optimized-roam. New devices will use 11k/v information when present&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Roaming: There are denied client roamings across different policy profiles. It is advisable to enable client vlan-persistent command to improve roaming experience&lt;BR /&gt;Action: By default, it is not allowed to roam on same WLAN over different policy profiles. This leads to client delete and a new on boarding is required. Use the command wireless client vlan-persistent on 17.3.4 or higher, to improve roaming.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are running 17.9.5. Do you have any experience on the above suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:16:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226591#M277960</guid>
      <dc:creator>William Foster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-20T00:16:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226605#M277965</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That advice is provided because those are common mistakes.&amp;nbsp; You are well advised to follow it.&amp;nbsp; Refer to the config guide if you want more info on the commands.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Optimized Roaming is covered in the Best Practices guide (link below).&amp;nbsp; A lot of the advice from the tool is based on the guide.&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/9800/technical-reference/c9800-best-practices.html#Optimizedroaming" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/9800/technical-reference/c9800-best-practices.html#Optimizedroaming&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Roaming between policy tags is also covered there:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/9800/technical-reference/c9800-best-practices.html#Roamingbetweenpolicytags" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/9800/technical-reference/c9800-best-practices.html#Roamingbetweenpolicytags&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As already advised refer to the TAC recommended code versions (link below) because 17.9.x is approaching end of life.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:43:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226605#M277965</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-20T00:43:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9800-L WLC roaming issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226667#M277969</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/328158"&gt;@William Foster&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; wrote : &amp;gt;.&lt;EM&gt;..We are running 17.9.5. Do you have any experience on the above suggestions?&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; No detailed experience ,it comes down to toggling those parameters and observe the result, also note that client roaming decisions are always autonomous ; also make sure that the driver(s) of the wireless card(s) are up to date.&lt;BR /&gt;You can also adjust the wireless roaming sensitivity on the adapter ,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 07:02:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-9800-l-wlc-roaming-issues/m-p/5226667#M277969</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-20T07:02:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

