<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: &amp;quot;IP Address Theft&amp;quot; Dual Band WiFi Speed Boost in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quot-ip-address-theft-quot-dual-band-wifi-speed-boost/m-p/5310625#M284858</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The solution is already included, please check the link &lt;A href="https://itnet.lu/dual_band_dhcp/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer"&gt;https://itnet.lu/dual_band_dhcp/&lt;/A&gt;. Case was open with Cisco but the TAC was not able to detect the issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;This post is intended to help others avoid spending unnecessary time and resources on this issue.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Solution summary:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After extensive testing, the culprit was identified:&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Xiaomi’s Dual Band WiFi Speed Boost&lt;/STRONG&gt;. When enabled, this feature:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Connects to the SSID using one radio (e.g., 5 GHz).&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Obtains a DHCP lease.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Then connects again using the second radio (e.g., 2.4 GHz), triggering a&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;new DHCP request&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The DHCP server interprets this as a conflict, issues a NAK, and the device sends ARP probes for the invalid IP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 13:05:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Amore</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-17T13:05:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>"IP Address Theft" Dual Band WiFi Speed Boost</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quot-ip-address-theft-quot-dual-band-wifi-speed-boost/m-p/5310617#M284856</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="paragraph-in-scc-markdown-text ___1ngh792 ftgm304 f1iaxwol"&gt;Subject:&amp;nbsp;"IP Address Theft" Dual Band WiFi Speed Boost&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="paragraph-in-scc-markdown-text ___1ngh792 ftgm304 f1iaxwol"&gt;I encountered a recurring issue in enterprise Wi-Fi setups involving Xiaomi devices. When the&amp;nbsp;Dual Band WiFi Speed Boost&amp;nbsp;feature is enabled, the device connects using both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz radios, triggering&amp;nbsp;multiple DHCP requests. This leads to IP conflicts, DHCP NAKs, and ARP probes—ultimately causing "IP Address Theft" triggered by WIPS and client constant disconnection.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="paragraph-in-scc-markdown-text ___1ngh792 ftgm304 f1iaxwol"&gt;Disabling the feature resolves the issue. I took me a few weeks to get the logs and analysis.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="paragraph-in-scc-markdown-text ___1ngh792 ftgm304 f1iaxwol"&gt;For full technical details and log analysis, check:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://itnet.lu/dual_band_dhcp/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://itnet.lu/dual_band_dhcp/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:51:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quot-ip-address-theft-quot-dual-band-wifi-speed-boost/m-p/5310617#M284856</guid>
      <dc:creator>Amore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-17T12:51:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "IP Address Theft" Dual Band WiFi Speed Boost</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quot-ip-address-theft-quot-dual-band-wifi-speed-boost/m-p/5310621#M284857</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You want solution?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:59:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quot-ip-address-theft-quot-dual-band-wifi-speed-boost/m-p/5310621#M284857</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-17T12:59:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "IP Address Theft" Dual Band WiFi Speed Boost</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quot-ip-address-theft-quot-dual-band-wifi-speed-boost/m-p/5310625#M284858</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The solution is already included, please check the link &lt;A href="https://itnet.lu/dual_band_dhcp/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer"&gt;https://itnet.lu/dual_band_dhcp/&lt;/A&gt;. Case was open with Cisco but the TAC was not able to detect the issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;This post is intended to help others avoid spending unnecessary time and resources on this issue.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Solution summary:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After extensive testing, the culprit was identified:&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Xiaomi’s Dual Band WiFi Speed Boost&lt;/STRONG&gt;. When enabled, this feature:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Connects to the SSID using one radio (e.g., 5 GHz).&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Obtains a DHCP lease.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Then connects again using the second radio (e.g., 2.4 GHz), triggering a&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;new DHCP request&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The DHCP server interprets this as a conflict, issues a NAK, and the device sends ARP probes for the invalid IP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 13:05:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quot-ip-address-theft-quot-dual-band-wifi-speed-boost/m-p/5310625#M284858</guid>
      <dc:creator>Amore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-17T13:05:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "IP Address Theft" Dual Band WiFi Speed Boost</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quot-ip-address-theft-quot-dual-band-wifi-speed-boost/m-p/5311430#M284920</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1302808"&gt;@Amore&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;you don't mention, and neither does the article: does the device use the same MAC address on both bands (in other words trying to get 2 different IP addresses for the same MAC)?&lt;BR /&gt;If so then it seems like a pretty stupid feature in my opinion!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;WiFi 7 (802.11be) addresses this requirement in a standardised way with MLO.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 21:56:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quot-ip-address-theft-quot-dual-band-wifi-speed-boost/m-p/5311430#M284920</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-19T21:56:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "IP Address Theft" Dual Band WiFi Speed Boost</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quot-ip-address-theft-quot-dual-band-wifi-speed-boost/m-p/5317995#M285381</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Rich,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I double-checked the capture, and yes — the same MAC address appears when connecting via both 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz bands, as shown in the log with the second DHCP request:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;D/DhcpClient(8269): Received packet: 48:7e:25:b1:92:f1 NAK
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This matches the MAC address seen on the 5 GHz connection.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The APs model only support 802.11ac Wave 2. This isn't 802.11BE; it's just a variation of dual-band support implemented by certain client vendors.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The challenge with BYOD devices is that you can't manage this feature directly, and you have no visibility into the user's configuration to diagnose the issue. All you get is the usual vague complaint: “The Wi-Fi isn’t working.” &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Xiaomi support basic answer was reset your phone .....&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:32:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quot-ip-address-theft-quot-dual-band-wifi-speed-boost/m-p/5317995#M285381</guid>
      <dc:creator>Amore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-06T08:32:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "IP Address Theft" Dual Band WiFi Speed Boost</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quot-ip-address-theft-quot-dual-band-wifi-speed-boost/m-p/5321908#M285615</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hmmm interesting - could be server-specific behaviour or would have to see exactly what is in those DHCP requests to understand why it's causing a NAK.&amp;nbsp; My instinct is that most servers would simply treat that as a renew when the MAC address is the same.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 10:06:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quot-ip-address-theft-quot-dual-band-wifi-speed-boost/m-p/5321908#M285615</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-19T10:06:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

