<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: C9800 RLAN in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/c9800-rlan/m-p/5317372#M285328</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Separate policy tag is not a bad idea, you will have more flexibility in future.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 03:29:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ambuj M</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-05T03:29:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>C9800 RLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/c9800-rlan/m-p/5317355#M285326</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Im configuring AP C9105 switched AP on 9800 WLC. its flex local switching with AP ports to act as a switch in different VLANs. should I use the existing&amp;nbsp; Policy TAG with WLCAN-POLICY MAPs and add RLAN-Policy Maps or create a new policy TAG dedicated for this type of APs ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 23:50:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/c9800-rlan/m-p/5317355#M285326</guid>
      <dc:creator>Najib Akbari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-04T23:50:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: C9800 RLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/c9800-rlan/m-p/5317369#M285327</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would prefer to create a separate Policy Tag for RLAN to keep the config neat &amp;amp; clean. Reason being in regular Policy Tag, you map WLAN &amp;amp; Policy profile under WLAN-Policy Maps. Whereas for RLAN, you need to map under RLAN-Policy Map.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 03:03:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/c9800-rlan/m-p/5317369#M285327</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saikat Nandy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-05T03:03:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: C9800 RLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/c9800-rlan/m-p/5317372#M285328</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Separate policy tag is not a bad idea, you will have more flexibility in future.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 03:29:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/c9800-rlan/m-p/5317372#M285328</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ambuj M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-05T03:29:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

