<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Guest options in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/guest-options/m-p/5372561#M288826</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking for some guidance on improving our guest Wi‑Fi setup.&lt;BR /&gt;I'm running a 9800‑CL with ISE for 802.1X and guest services, supporting 35+ FlexConnect sites. We have two SSIDs:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Corp — for laptops, desktops, scanners, printers, etc.&lt;BR /&gt;Guest — for visitors and staff mobile devices (typically around 50 users per site).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Guest SSID currently uses a guest portal (or MAB) hosted on an ISE node in our DMZ. Over the last year it has become increasingly unreliable — particularly for Apple devices — and it's causing ongoing issues.&lt;BR /&gt;I’d like to move away from the portal solution, but I’m struggling to find a decent alternative:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Single PSK&lt;/STRONG&gt; isn’t ideal due to management expectations and concerns about it being widely shared, especially in countries where mobile data is expensive.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;iPSK&lt;/STRONG&gt; would be great, but it doesn't seem practical for guests since we’d need to pre‑load MAC addresses.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;mPSK&lt;/STRONG&gt; looks promising too, but the controller appears to allow only five PSKs. Is there any way to increase this? Ideally I’d prefer a unique PSK per site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a better approach I should consider?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance for any advice.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 09:57:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>robbyde0100</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-25T09:57:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Guest options</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/guest-options/m-p/5372561#M288826</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking for some guidance on improving our guest Wi‑Fi setup.&lt;BR /&gt;I'm running a 9800‑CL with ISE for 802.1X and guest services, supporting 35+ FlexConnect sites. We have two SSIDs:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Corp — for laptops, desktops, scanners, printers, etc.&lt;BR /&gt;Guest — for visitors and staff mobile devices (typically around 50 users per site).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Guest SSID currently uses a guest portal (or MAB) hosted on an ISE node in our DMZ. Over the last year it has become increasingly unreliable — particularly for Apple devices — and it's causing ongoing issues.&lt;BR /&gt;I’d like to move away from the portal solution, but I’m struggling to find a decent alternative:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Single PSK&lt;/STRONG&gt; isn’t ideal due to management expectations and concerns about it being widely shared, especially in countries where mobile data is expensive.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;iPSK&lt;/STRONG&gt; would be great, but it doesn't seem practical for guests since we’d need to pre‑load MAC addresses.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;mPSK&lt;/STRONG&gt; looks promising too, but the controller appears to allow only five PSKs. Is there any way to increase this? Ideally I’d prefer a unique PSK per site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a better approach I should consider?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance for any advice.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 09:57:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/guest-options/m-p/5372561#M288826</guid>
      <dc:creator>robbyde0100</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-25T09:57:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Guest options</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/guest-options/m-p/5372727#M288840</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/264783"&gt;@robbyde0100&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you'd like to see what options are out there, you can check this great Cisco Live presentation from Mr. Ziliotto:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/emea/docs/2023/pdf/BRKEWN-2284.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/emea/docs/2023/pdf/BRKEWN-2284.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Maybe you can move from CWA to LWA (or viceversa), or Cisco Spaces portal could be another option but requires additional investment $.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope you find it useful!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Orlando.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 20:00:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/guest-options/m-p/5372727#M288840</guid>
      <dc:creator>OrlandoGM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-25T20:00:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

