<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic C9800 with Forescout RADIUS in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/c9800-with-forescout-radius/m-p/5376795#M289131</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Has anyone used the C9800 with Forescout as a RADIUS server? I’d like to know if you’ve encountered any issues, particularly with newer C9800 versions such as 17.15.x or 17.18.x.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 05:27:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bakaholic39</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-03-16T05:27:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>C9800 with Forescout RADIUS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/c9800-with-forescout-radius/m-p/5376795#M289131</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Has anyone used the C9800 with Forescout as a RADIUS server? I’d like to know if you’ve encountered any issues, particularly with newer C9800 versions such as 17.15.x or 17.18.x.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 05:27:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/c9800-with-forescout-radius/m-p/5376795#M289131</guid>
      <dc:creator>bakaholic39</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-16T05:27:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: C9800 with Forescout RADIUS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/c9800-with-forescout-radius/m-p/5376826#M289132</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I take this as 802.1x integration, I do not see any issue technically as long as most of the RADIUS are developed industry standards.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;WLC 9800 check below guide straight forward : (make sure check the code bug you mentioned).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/catalyst-9800-series-wireless-controllers/213919-configure-802-1x-authentication-on-catal.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/catalyst-9800-series-wireless-controllers/213919-configure-802-1x-authentication-on-catal.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;check this video (some how not able to visit the vendor website what changed recently) the site get 403 error.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6wbuIWPDD8" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6wbuIWPDD8&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 09:27:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/c9800-with-forescout-radius/m-p/5376826#M289132</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-16T09:27:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: C9800 with Forescout RADIUS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/c9800-with-forescout-radius/m-p/5378571#M289244</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/286878"&gt;@balaji.bandi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;says radius is a standard so as long as the radius server is standards compliant there is no reason why it should not work.&amp;nbsp; We use Free Radius.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 22:45:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/c9800-with-forescout-radius/m-p/5378571#M289244</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-22T22:45:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

