<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Wireless Lag (link aggregation) in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-lag-link-aggregation/m-p/1318020#M29284</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wouldn't this depend on the controller?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if it is a 4402, wouldn't you want both ports on the same switch due to the npu on the controller that is shared between ports?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:19:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ericgarnel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-30T13:19:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wireless Lag (link aggregation)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-lag-link-aggregation/m-p/1318016#M29279</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd like to know if i can be able to enable lag on the controller but termite it on 2 different switches? i.e. i have 2 ports on the controller, i connect 1 port on switch1 int g1/5 and connect port on switch3 port 1/10?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can i do this? as i need to configure etherchannel right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 00:53:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-lag-link-aggregation/m-p/1318016#M29279</guid>
      <dc:creator>lucky.sibanyoni</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T00:53:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Lag (link aggregation)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-lag-link-aggregation/m-p/1318017#M29280</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, the ports have to be connected to the same switch.  Reason being you have to setup a port-channel on the switch for those ports.  The only exception to spanning multiple switches is if you have 3750's in a stacked configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:03:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-lag-link-aggregation/m-p/1318017#M29280</guid>
      <dc:creator>dancampb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-29T14:03:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Lag (link aggregation)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-lag-link-aggregation/m-p/1318018#M29281</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for yr feedback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i'd like to know then, which method can i use for redundancy? can i connect the 2 ports into different switches without lag (would that provide me with redundancy?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:30:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-lag-link-aggregation/m-p/1318018#M29281</guid>
      <dc:creator>lucky.sibanyoni</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-30T06:30:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Lag (link aggregation)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-lag-link-aggregation/m-p/1318019#M29282</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you don't use LAG you could connect the ports between different switches.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-lag-link-aggregation/m-p/1318019#M29282</guid>
      <dc:creator>dancampb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-30T12:05:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Lag (link aggregation)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-lag-link-aggregation/m-p/1318020#M29284</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wouldn't this depend on the controller?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if it is a 4402, wouldn't you want both ports on the same switch due to the npu on the controller that is shared between ports?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:19:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-lag-link-aggregation/m-p/1318020#M29284</guid>
      <dc:creator>ericgarnel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-30T13:19:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

