topic Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage in Wireless

MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

Aditya Kurulkar — Mon, 26 Sep 2022 05:00:11 GMT

Hello Experts,

We are working on designing a greenfield Network design and deployment for out Super Specialty Hospital in India (bangalore). We are looking at MR44 vs MR46, although the specs say they are very similar. I wanted to hear from the experts here if there is any difference in terms of the coverage area that these APs have?

Like in a 20ft x 20ft area with few walls in the middle, would MR46 work or MR44. or would the coverage be the same.

consider the density is the same (Med density) I am more concerned on the coverage as it will affect the number of APs and ports on the access stack.

Hope this gives some good background.

Thanks ahead.

Regards,

Aditya!

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

MerakiGnome — Mon, 26 Sep 2022 05:36:10 GMT

If you look closely through the spec sheets of both the MR46 and MR44 you appear to get a little more oomph from the MR46's. Also pay attention to the signal coverage patterns within the data sheets, the coverage looks greater for the MR46's also:

https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/MR_Overview_and_Specifications/MR46_Datasheet

https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/MR_Overview_and_Specifications/MR44_Datasheet

What you may come across during the procurement process however is pressure from the sales rep to purchase the MR44's as they're shipping slightly quicker.

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

Aditya Kurulkar — Mon, 26 Sep 2022 06:16:02 GMT

Hi @DarrenOC

Thank you so much for sharing the links on the data sheet!

Yes you are right on the MR44's push that we receive from the sales team based on the availability. However as this is part of an NGO pricing is very important for us here! That is one more reason to push on the MR44's if that solves our purpose compared to MR46.

My main concern was would MR44 cover same area as MR46 ?

If yes, I do not mind go with MR44's instead.

Kindly Suggest!

Regards & Gratitude,

Aditya

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

Karsten Iwen — Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:47:36 GMT

We switched quickly from MR46 to MR44 when they came available and in Real Life (tm) didn't see any relevant differences.

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

Aditya Kurulkar — Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:35:31 GMT

Hey @Karsten Iwen thank you for responding. You did not see any diffs in the range/coverage you mean?

That is very interesting.

Thanks

Aditya

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

Karsten Iwen — Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:20:01 GMT

No, but the deployments where we removed the MR46 and replaced them with MR44 had a quite good coverage previously. And there no difference was seen.

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

Aditya Kurulkar — Mon, 26 Sep 2022 17:23:06 GMT

Thank you all for your responses and guidance here!

Appreciate the support.

Regards

Aditya

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

Viking1971 — Tue, 11 Jul 2023 18:27:07 GMT

May I ask why you switched? At face value, it would seem a downgrade.

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

Karsten Iwen — Tue, 11 Jul 2023 21:02:46 GMT

The MR44 are cheaper and with 5GHz only there is no real difference. The MR46 were moved to a site that didn’t need many APs and the old site was equipped completely with more MR44s as additional floors were used.

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

TinOmen — Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:31:35 GMT

I can't speak for the MR46's, but I have about 20 of the MR44 deployed in my organization. Environment is pretty open with low to medium density and they've shown to have great range and handle the traffic very well.

The price vs performance difference between the two look to me like the MR44 is the better bang for you buck imo.

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

danjns — Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:38:00 GMT

Coverage is easy… capacity is hard.

Use software to design your space. Something like Hamina or Ekahau.

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

MerakiGnome — Thu, 13 Jul 2023 15:38:12 GMT

Hi @danjns, when did you make it onto this board?

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

danjns — Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:07:56 GMT

Hi @DarrenOC , just got here! Hopefully I can help and get some advice too

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

Viking1971 — Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:27:27 GMT

Thanks for your reply.

It is my understanding that 44s are not 5GHz only, but that they handle 2.4 in 2x2 as opposed to 4x4.

It is also my understanding that the 46s are better for denser areas, so the site that didn't need many AP's would have been a better placement for the 44s. No?

I'm not questioning, I'm trying to borrow your experience to make my decision. 🙂

And about the old site equipped completely with more 44s, I believe that you mean that the new ones you bought were for this old site and by switching to 44s you avoided mix-and-matching and covered the entire space with one model AP, yes?

Thanks again!

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

Karsten Iwen — Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:52:15 GMT

The 5 GHz only was that we didn't care about 2.4, The Business-SSIDs are 5GHz only. 2.4 is enabled on the Guest SSID. In this setup we have 4*4 on the SSIDs we care of for a reduced price per AP. The rest was exactly as you say. We try not to mix APs which is quite easy if there are enough sites to shift the APs around.

The next shifting will be more complex as the CWs have other mounting plates compared to the MRs.

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

MerakiGnome — Thu, 13 Jul 2023 19:30:25 GMT

There’s nothing you don’t know about WiFi. Great to see you

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

danjns — Thu, 13 Jul 2023 19:32:19 GMT

I wish!! There’s always so much to learn and never enough time.

Re: MR44 vs MR46 Access Point Coverage

Viking1971 — Thu, 13 Jul 2023 20:39:57 GMT

Thanks so much again.