<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Firmware Network Issue MR30.5 in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484751#M296209</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;While support works through this issue the workaround that I have found that works is to set the switchport to 100Mbps Full duplex or to only allow speed negotiation on the switch port to 10Mpbs and 100Mbps removing 1000Mbps from the negotiation option (this last option is available in some vendor switches).  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The issue described only happens when the switchport is 1000Mbps capable but the cable between the MR36/46/56 and the switch has only two pairs.  The obvious answer is to use a four pair cable but in the case of the need for splitters or the cable can not be replace then the workaround should work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 16:50:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ppurroy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-01-09T16:50:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firmware Network Issue MR30.5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484742#M296200</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi together,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have a bad condition with &lt;SPAN&gt;MR 29.6.1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; → &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;MR 30.5 on  AP MR36 ....&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Let's try to describe:&lt;BR /&gt;We have 100 AP's, MR33, 36, 55 ...&lt;BR /&gt;In some classrooms we didn't have enough RJ-45 plug near the beamer/projector, so we had used network Splitter. (1)&lt;BR /&gt;This had works well with Firmware up to 29.6.1. After Upgrade to Firmware MR 30.5 all MR36 no longer has network connection to the MS Switches, if they are connected through a Network Splitter. They still are powered with PoE and could mesh, but they no longer accept the LAN Cable. On the Meraki Networkswitch the Accesspoint Port ist showen as only PoE, but not LAN connected&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;MR33 don't have this issue with MR 30.5&lt;BR /&gt;MR36 don't have this issue without splitter, or with the Firmware MR 29.6.x (or MR 28.x)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If i replace a "failed MR36" with a MR33, it work on the same cable with the Firmware 30.5.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I downgrade for now the firmware back to 29.6.1 and it's all "fine" - but we would like to use the a newer Firmware MR 30.x if the "bug" is fixed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;... Yes, RJ-45 Splitters aren't the greatest way to use a single Cat6e Port as two Cat 5e Ports.&lt;BR /&gt;Sadly we can't use a tiny network switch as we had two completly different VLAN Settings on this Cat5e Ports.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) &lt;IMG src="https://www.computercablestore.com/content/images/thumbs/0013954_cat5e-network-splitter-pair.jpeg" border="0" /&gt;PS: probely i'll have to open a bug report&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:34:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484742#M296200</guid>
      <dc:creator>BuDo_KSBA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-09T08:34:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firmware Network Issue MR30.5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484743#M296201</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;- You may file a bug report , what exactly makes it not work with a&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt; network splitter&lt;/FONT&gt; in this version, is not known for me but for sure I would consider it being an unsupported network terminator especially for an AP. Usually it then comes down to the reverse : &lt;EM&gt;some kind of fix makes the AP behave correctly on&lt;FONT color="#008000"&gt; the&lt;U&gt;/every&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; network...&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 10:41:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484743#M296201</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-09T10:41:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firmware Network Issue MR30.5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484744#M296202</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For me the "funny" Part was that only the newer MR36er AP has this issue, the MR33 can handle it.&lt;BR /&gt;As a normal Cat Cable has 8 "pin", the Splitter devide it in 2x 4 Pin. So two device has a "4 pin" cable. And it looks that the MR36 with fresher firmware no longer accept a 4 pin connection.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So i'll open a bug case and hope this condition could be fixed &lt;SPAN class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 10:47:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484744#M296202</guid>
      <dc:creator>BuDo_KSBA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-09T10:47:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firmware Network Issue MR30.5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484745#M296203</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt; &lt;U&gt;&lt;EM&gt;           &amp;gt;....&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;EM&gt;So i'll open a bug case and hope this condition could be fixed&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; - You could do it , but I have doubts that the claim will be accepted : in theory network performance could get obstructed and or have a &lt;FONT color="#FF6600"&gt;negative impact&lt;/FONT&gt; on &lt;STRONG&gt;connected&lt;/STRONG&gt; client(s)&lt;EM&gt; network performance&lt;/EM&gt;. Let's say :&lt;FONT color="#008000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt; it's safe to go for a standard network connection for AP(s)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; M. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 11:35:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484745#M296203</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-09T11:35:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firmware Network Issue MR30.5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484746#M296204</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.meraki.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/55357"&gt;@Mark Elsen&lt;/A&gt;  it's fully clear, it has impact &lt;SPAN class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😄&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;  --  we installed the splitters about 18 month ago and the Accesspoints connect since then only "100 Mbit full-duplex" and no longer Gigabit.&lt;BR /&gt;As the issue is only on MR36, i thought it could have to do with the mGB Connector on MR36.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 12:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484746#M296204</guid>
      <dc:creator>BuDo_KSBA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-09T12:04:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firmware Network Issue MR30.5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484747#M296205</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;  Ok, let us know what they have to say about it!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 12:31:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484747#M296205</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-09T12:31:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firmware Network Issue MR30.5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484748#M296206</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i have the same on my access point when i wall back on old firmware everything is working but the port is at 100mega. and when a make the update the access point stay down, i think they stay on the old firmware. and due to cable issue i think they can't get the new update of 30.5.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will troubleshoot the issue. My switchs are PoE&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 13:48:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484748#M296206</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nightstick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-09T13:48:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firmware Network Issue MR30.5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484749#M296207</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.meraki.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/99621"&gt;@Nightstick&lt;/A&gt;  - in my case the accesspoint got PoE power and than search very log for a mesh neighbors. After it establish a connection over mesh it "works", but without use of LAN Cabeling.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It looks to help first manualy force the switch networkport to "half duplex 100" so AP can start with LAN, but i got high portion of CRC &lt;SPAN class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BuDo_KSBA_0-1704809130349.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="image.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/273112i2EB8339544C95B2C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BuDo_KSBA_1-1704809170179.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="image.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/273123i967684115222802E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:06:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484749#M296207</guid>
      <dc:creator>BuDo_KSBA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-09T14:06:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firmware Network Issue MR30.5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484750#M296208</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.meraki.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/55357"&gt;@Mark Elsen&lt;/A&gt;  first response -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please confirm the make and model of the referenced "network splitter" in use?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.delock.de/produkt/65177/merkmale.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://www.delock.de/produkt/65177/merkmale.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Better than they won't give a try &lt;SPAN class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:15:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484750#M296208</guid>
      <dc:creator>BuDo_KSBA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-09T14:15:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firmware Network Issue MR30.5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484751#M296209</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;While support works through this issue the workaround that I have found that works is to set the switchport to 100Mbps Full duplex or to only allow speed negotiation on the switch port to 10Mpbs and 100Mbps removing 1000Mbps from the negotiation option (this last option is available in some vendor switches).  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The issue described only happens when the switchport is 1000Mbps capable but the cable between the MR36/46/56 and the switch has only two pairs.  The obvious answer is to use a four pair cable but in the case of the need for splitters or the cable can not be replace then the workaround should work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 16:50:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484751#M296209</guid>
      <dc:creator>ppurroy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-09T16:50:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firmware Network Issue MR30.5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484752#M296210</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the tips, it works for me&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 17:20:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484752#M296210</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nightstick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-09T17:20:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firmware Network Issue MR30.5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484753#M296211</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BuDo_KSBA_0-1704820346157.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="image.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/273120iA228FE3C6A87AE11/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BuDo_KSBA_1-1704820370576.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="image.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/273113i58964B30C8E615CA/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On my Test-Accesspoint &lt;SPAN class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":thumbs_up:"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":thumbs_up:"&gt;👍&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😊&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; -  worked fine. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BuDo_KSBA_2-1704821726461.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="image.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/273118i42D6E5503B50251E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 17:35:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/firmware-network-issue-mr30-5/m-p/5484753#M296211</guid>
      <dc:creator>BuDo_KSBA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-09T17:35:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

