<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: License charge for access point reaching EOL in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493554#M299430</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What do you mean with one system exactly?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The thing that bugs me the most is the ETSI regulator and European countries putting ridiculous restrictions about not allowing outdoor AP's or external antennas on 6 GHz.  This is the reason why the CW916x line is so limited.  So you can have an SSID that is perfectly running on the indoor AP's on 6 GHz, but when you have an outdoor AP like the CW9163E, it will not enable 6 GHz because of the restrictions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:00:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>joey.debra</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-10-18T16:00:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>License charge for access point reaching EOL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493546#M299422</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Licenses for my access points need to be renewed in November but the access points will reach end of life next July. Will I still need to pay for a full year license?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 17:02:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493546#M299422</guid>
      <dc:creator>MBW1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T17:02:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License charge for access point reaching EOL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493547#M299423</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The AP licenses are independent of the AP model. You can use your license with the model you have (even after EOS) or just replace the current AP with a newer model. The license won't change.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 17:34:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493547#M299423</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T17:34:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License charge for access point reaching EOL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493548#M299424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Bear in mind that End of Life doesn't mean it will stop working.  After that point though, the level of support you'll get on such a device will be fairly significantly decreased;   it wouldn't be replaced under warranty, if it failed,   Meraki Support would max. provide best efforts assistance with it,  and there's no guarantee of any fixes in firmware - e.g. for bugs and/or security issues.    As Karsten pointed out though, AP licences are not model specific, so most customers simply take the old one off the wall and buy a newer model in its place and nothing is else needed, until that license itself needs renewing.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 18:09:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493548#M299424</guid>
      <dc:creator>GreenMan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T18:09:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License charge for access point reaching EOL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493549#M299425</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Personally, I would get new APs with your new licences.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;APs have evolved so much.  I'm guessing you must still be using WiFi5.  You are missing out on a lot.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:11:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493549#M299425</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T20:11:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License charge for access point reaching EOL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493550#M299426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Although I am eagerly waiting for the upcoming Wi-Fi 7 APs, I really think that roughly 90% of companies could still run Wi-Fi 4 and they would be ok with that ... &lt;SPAN class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_sunglasses:"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_sunglasses:"&gt;😎&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; Yes, not the Wi-Fi first companies, but many others.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:15:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493550#M299426</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T20:15:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License charge for access point reaching EOL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493551#M299427</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I can't even deploy WiFi 6E into general production because of compatibility issues, especially with IoT devices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not feeling very hopefully for WiFi 7 ...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:29:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493551#M299427</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T20:29:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License charge for access point reaching EOL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493552#M299428</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All my (and customers') IoT stuff is kept on a 2.4/5 GHz only SSID. 6GHz is only for the Corp WLAN and, depending on the customer, these WLANs already have around 40 to 70% of all corporate clients on 6 GHz (typical Office Environments). And with the iPhone16 having Wi-Fi7, I see an upcoming demand for these APs. But likely most will stay with CW916x as I expect that the early Wi-Fi 7 APs will be more high-end devices and be really expensive.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 21:00:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493552#M299428</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T21:00:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License charge for access point reaching EOL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493553#M299429</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would really prefer to have to just have one system ...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 21:04:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493553#M299429</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T21:04:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License charge for access point reaching EOL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493554#M299430</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What do you mean with one system exactly?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The thing that bugs me the most is the ETSI regulator and European countries putting ridiculous restrictions about not allowing outdoor AP's or external antennas on 6 GHz.  This is the reason why the CW916x line is so limited.  So you can have an SSID that is perfectly running on the indoor AP's on 6 GHz, but when you have an outdoor AP like the CW9163E, it will not enable 6 GHz because of the restrictions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:00:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/license-charge-for-access-point-reaching-eol/m-p/5493554#M299430</guid>
      <dc:creator>joey.debra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-18T16:00:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

