<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SANET AUTHC failure ??? in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/sanet-authc-failure/m-p/5542552#M312609</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Mark,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are experiencing a similar issue across our environment. When users are docked (wired) and then undock and connect to the corporate Wi-Fi, they often get stuck in a “no internet” state.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the authentication side, everything looks normal—on Cisco ISE, the user shows as successfully authenticated. However, it appears the client ends up in a stale session conflict after transitioning from the wired docking station to Wi-Fi.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the controller perspective (Cisco 9800-CL with FlexConnect), the client initially gets stuck in the “IP Learn” policy state. After some time, the device does obtain an IP address, but the “no internet” status remains and the user cannot access any resources.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This issue is recurring across the organization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We’re looking for a permanent solution to prevent these stale session conflicts during wired-to-wireless transitions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Baranldo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-03T00:29:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SANET AUTHC failure ???</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/sanet-authc-failure/m-p/4788520#M252731</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are tracking the client's wireless disconnection.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would like to know what "SANET AUTHC failure" means.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="press_IMG_0566.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/178231i5AB37665DD2E2099/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="press_IMG_0566.png" alt="press_IMG_0566.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2023 09:59:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/sanet-authc-failure/m-p/4788520#M252731</guid>
      <dc:creator>JustTakeTheFirstStep</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-07T09:59:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SANET AUTHC failure ???</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/sanet-authc-failure/m-p/4788589#M252742</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- Following this document&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://blogs.cisco.com/networking/new-software-architecture-enables-session-aware-networking-to-massively-scale-authentication-and-access-policy-control" target="_blank"&gt;https://blogs.cisco.com/networking/new-software-architecture-enables-session-aware-networking-to-massively-scale-authentication-and-access-policy-control&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;, SANET refers to&amp;nbsp;Authentication methods available including 802.1X, Web Authentication, and MAC Authentication Bypass (MAB) , ISE. Therefore you can check (for instance) ISE &lt;STRONG&gt;logs&lt;/STRONG&gt; and lookup that particular authentication request for a client and check why it fails. For the clients that disconnect also use client debugging as described in&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://logadvisor.cisco.com/logadvisor/wireless/9800/9800ClientConnectivity" target="_blank"&gt;https://logadvisor.cisco.com/logadvisor/wireless/9800/9800ClientConnectivity&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;, you&amp;nbsp; can have client debugs analyzed with :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://cway.cisco.com/wireless-debug-analyzer" target="_blank"&gt;https://cway.cisco.com/wireless-debug-analyzer&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; This may provide more insights as to the client behavior.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;U&gt; Appendix :&lt;/U&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;-&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Review your 9800 controller configuration with the CLI command :&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#008000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;show&amp;nbsp; tech&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;&amp;nbsp;wireless&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;, have the output analyzed by&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://cway.cisco.com/tools/WirelessAnalyzer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://cway.cisco.com/tools/WirelessAnalyzer/&amp;amp;source=gmail&amp;amp;ust=1662270212514000&amp;amp;usg=AOvVaw1v8X824xUFwNwiDM_o5Fxf"&gt;https://cway.cisco.com/&lt;WBR /&gt;tools/WirelessAnalyzer/&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; , please note do not use classical&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;&amp;nbsp;show tech-support&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;(short version) , use the command denoted in green for Wireless Analyzer.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Checkout all advisories!&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2023 11:45:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/sanet-authc-failure/m-p/4788589#M252742</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-07T11:45:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SANET AUTHC failure ???</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/sanet-authc-failure/m-p/5542552#M312609</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Mark,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are experiencing a similar issue across our environment. When users are docked (wired) and then undock and connect to the corporate Wi-Fi, they often get stuck in a “no internet” state.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the authentication side, everything looks normal—on Cisco ISE, the user shows as successfully authenticated. However, it appears the client ends up in a stale session conflict after transitioning from the wired docking station to Wi-Fi.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the controller perspective (Cisco 9800-CL with FlexConnect), the client initially gets stuck in the “IP Learn” policy state. After some time, the device does obtain an IP address, but the “no internet” status remains and the user cannot access any resources.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This issue is recurring across the organization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We’re looking for a permanent solution to prevent these stale session conflicts during wired-to-wireless transitions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/sanet-authc-failure/m-p/5542552#M312609</guid>
      <dc:creator>Baranldo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-03T00:29:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

