<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic WiSM Redundance in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wism-redundance/m-p/631285#M32470</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have more tha 400 AP, which I administrate (hope so) through 2 WiSM Modules in one  catalyst 6500, I have two more WiSM in another  6500 for redundance in case of failure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well my question is how to make redundance work, I already configure the primary, secondary and tertiary WiSM. The APs register succesfully with the WiSM I want, but when I take the WiSM out of work, the APs do not register by the secondary WiSM, they register with other WiSM that I even specified. What can I do. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(AP Fallback is already enable)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your time and wish you a merry christmas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fernando&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 20:24:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>landovalbo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-03T20:24:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WiSM Redundance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wism-redundance/m-p/631285#M32470</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have more tha 400 AP, which I administrate (hope so) through 2 WiSM Modules in one  catalyst 6500, I have two more WiSM in another  6500 for redundance in case of failure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well my question is how to make redundance work, I already configure the primary, secondary and tertiary WiSM. The APs register succesfully with the WiSM I want, but when I take the WiSM out of work, the APs do not register by the secondary WiSM, they register with other WiSM that I even specified. What can I do. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(AP Fallback is already enable)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your time and wish you a merry christmas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fernando&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 20:24:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wism-redundance/m-p/631285#M32470</guid>
      <dc:creator>landovalbo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T20:24:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WiSM Redundance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wism-redundance/m-p/631286#M32471</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Fernando,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are all of the controllers configured as mobility group members under each respective controller?  In the GUI, click on &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Controller-&amp;gt;Mobility Groups&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All of the controllers need to be defined under the same mobility group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, are the controllers all using the same virtual ip address (typically 1.1.1.1)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Merry Christmas to you as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Ben&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 21:23:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wism-redundance/m-p/631286#M32471</guid>
      <dc:creator>Benjamin Solero</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-20T21:23:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WiSM Redundance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wism-redundance/m-p/631287#M32472</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes they are on the same mobility group and using the 1.1.1.1 virtual ip address&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fernando&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 01:51:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wism-redundance/m-p/631287#M32472</guid>
      <dc:creator>landovalbo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-21T01:51:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WiSM Redundance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wism-redundance/m-p/631288#M32473</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please can you help me to solve this problem :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- We have 4402 series Wireless Controller, and ACS SE 1116 hardware appliance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Authentication between ACS &amp;amp; Wireless Controller is PEAP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- ACS is integrated with Active Directory using Remote Agent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Up to this level everything is working perfect.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Customer asked to use Digital Certificates for authentication between client and ACS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- We have created self generated certificate on the ACS &amp;amp; installed it on a client Laptop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The problem is that still any client can access using the username and password of the Active Directory (authentication is happening without &amp;amp; with certificate).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Customer is requesting that clients should access ONLY using certificates (mandatory).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the system is work very good&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but this is the problem. we need to make the client connected with username and password but with the certificate .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please advice &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:41:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wism-redundance/m-p/631288#M32473</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahmedalshami</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-21T12:41:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WiSM Redundance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wism-redundance/m-p/631289#M32474</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It could be a number of things.  Do the 'debug lwapp events enable' and 'debug pm pki enable' show anything on the controller to which you want the APs to join?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ben&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 02:56:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wism-redundance/m-p/631289#M32474</guid>
      <dc:creator>Benjamin Solero</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-22T02:56:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WiSM Redundance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wism-redundance/m-p/631290#M32475</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; On the field Controller Name, I wrote the Ip Address of the controller instead of the Name.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bad error from me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:09:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wism-redundance/m-p/631290#M32475</guid>
      <dc:creator>landovalbo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-10T11:09:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

